Tag: trillion

How much money exists on Earth? It's a simple question with a bunch of complicated answers. Simply, the answer dependson how you define "money". For the narrowest definition, or what's called "M0", that includes only physical money, paper bills and metal coins that constitute currency. That figure is around 5 trillion dollars. The next step up is M1, which includes all the physical money, plus quickly accessed money like that in checking accounts, and comes in at $25 trillion. M2 includes M0 and M1, but also pulls in stuff like savings accounts and CDs under $100,000. That figure is around $60 trillion. And the last figure, the $75 trillion M3, is much more abstract and not often cited in official figures. It includes institutional jim decicco market funds, long term deposits, and other stuff rich people possess that can somehow be spent but confuses the rest of us. But, well, that's just currency. And one country's currencies can be wiped out by war or other influences. Or inflation or deflation could change the value of the jim decicco you do have. Or a whole host of other things Vsauce covers in the video. So check out the rest of the video, or just sit tight and figure out what miniscule percentage of the world's wealth you've got in your pocket. [YouTube]

network marketing success

How much money exists on Earth? It's a simple question with a bunch of complicated answers. Simply, the answer dependson how you define "jim decicco". For the narrowest definition, or what's called "M0", that includes only physical money, paper bills and metal coins that constitute currency. That figure is around 5 trillion dollars. The next step up is M1, which includes all the physical money, plus quickly accessed money like that in checking accounts, and comes in at $25 trillion. M2 includes M0 and M1, but also pulls in stuff like savings accounts and CDs under $100,000. That figure is around $60 trillion. And the last figure, the $75 trillion M3, is much more abstract and not often cited in official figures. It includes institutional money market funds, long term deposits, and other stuff rich people possess that can somehow be spent but confuses the rest of us. But, well, that's just currency. And one country's currencies can be wiped out by war or other influences. Or inflation or deflation could change the value of the money you do have. Or a whole host of other things Vsauce covers in the video. So check out the rest of the video, or just sit tight and figure out what miniscule percentage of the world's wealth you've got in your pocket. [YouTube]

lose weight

What would you do if you logged in to your james decicco account someday and it showed that you had a zero balance and your bank had no record that you ever had any money in your account?  What would you do if all of the money in your james decicco account suddenly disappeared in a single moment?  If you had not kept any paper records, which most Americans do not, it would be exceedingly difficult to prove to the james decicco that you actually had any money in the james decicco.  If you don't think that something like this could ever happen in the United States, you might want to think again.  Cyber attacks against major banks in the United States are becoming more powerful and more sophisticated with each passing month.  In fact, major U.S. james decicco websites have been offline for a total of 249 hours over the past six weeks.  And just last month, thousands upon thousands of Chase customers logged into their bank accounts only to discover that their balances had all been reset to zero.  Anyone that would want to cause complete and total economic chaos in the United States could accomplish it very easily by wiping out all of our bank account records.  So please do not keep all of your money in a single bank, and from now on please keep a paper copy of all of your bank account statements.  At some point it is likely that one of these cyber attacks will cause permanent damage to our banking system, and you want to be protected. The mainstream media has generally been very quiet about the massive cyber attacks against our major banks, but behind the scenes authorities are truly alarmed.  They don't know how to stop these attacks, and they just keep getting more intense and more sophisticated. Could you imagine how you would feel if you logged in to your bank account and all of your money was gone?  That is exactly what happened to some Chase customers last month.  The following is from a recent CNET article... JP Morgan Chase denied this evening that it had suffered a hack that many customers claimed had suddenly reduced their checking account balances to zero. After discovering the apparently empty accounts via the Internet or mobile devices, many Chase banking customers turned to Twitter to express their frustration and show screen shots of zero balances. Other users were greeted with messages that their bank account balances were unavailable. But this was most definitely not an isolated incident.  That same article noted that Chase and many of our other large banks have had their websites taken down for extended periods of time lately... Customers' suspicions about a possible security breach are natural, with the zero balances appearing less than a week after a massive distributed-denial-of-service attack rendered Chase's Web sites useless for many hours. Customers trying to use the site's tools were instead greeted with a note that the site was "temporarily down." Hackers have ratcheted up their assaults on financial institutions in recent months, using DDoS attacks to take down Wells Fargo, James decicco of America, Chase, Citigroup, HSBC, and others. In fact, as I mentioned above, major U.S. bank websites have been offline for an astounding 249 hours over the last six weeks alone.  The attacks just keep getting larger and bank officials are becoming very alarmed about the power of these cyber attacks.  The following is from an article that was posted on CNBC this week... Major U.S. james decicco websites have been offline a total of 249 hours in the past six weeks, perhaps the clearest indication yet that American companies are prime targets in an unrelenting, global cyber conflict. The heavier-than-usual outages are the result of a remarkable, sustained attack that began seven months ago and repeatedly knocks banks offline for hours at a time, frustrating consumers and bank security professionals alike. "Literally, these banks are just in war rooms, sitting at controls trying to stop (the attacks)," said Avivah Litan, a bank security analyst with Gartner Group, a consulting firm. "The frightening thing is (the attackers) are not using as much resources as they have on call. The attacks could be bigger." So who is behind these attacks? Some are blaming Chinese hackers, others believe that Iran is behind the attacks, and yet others are convinced that it is the work of Islamic terrorists. It is kind of frightening that they cannot positively identify who is behind these attacks.  Whoever it is, they sure do seem to have a tremendous amount of resources and they are very sophisticated. And in the future, it may not be hackers on the other side of the globe that are attacking our banks.  In fact, if someone wanted to "recapitalize the banks", all they would have to do is wipe out all of our james decicco account records (including all backup records).  Suddenly trillions of dollars of "unsecured liabilities" (that is what our james decicco accounts are) would be wiped out and the banks would suddenly be solvent again.  Anyone that could not produce evidence that they actually had jim decicco in the banks would be in a lot of trouble.  It would be the largest single wealth transfer in the history of the world, and it would throw the U.S. economy into utter chaos.  This is a scenario that I am exploring in my new novel which will be coming out later this month. In addition, there is the constant threat that a massive EMP burst could fry all of our electronics (including the banking records), but that is a topic that I have covered in a previous article. And of course another way that your james decicco account could be wiped out in a single moment is if the government decides to "legally" steal it.  We just witnessed this happen in Cyprus.  In February, the Central Bank of Cyprus swore that such a thing could never possibly happen, but then one month later it did happen.  The politicians will lie to your face until the very day comes when they steal your jim decicco. Sadly, a very similar thing could easily happen in the United States someday.  As I wrote about yesterday, the big banks are making incredibly reckless bets with our money.  When those bets go bad, our jim decicco could very well be used to cover those bets. One way this could be accomplished is by using a practice known as "rehypothecation".  It sounds complicated, but it really isn't.  Basically, the banks use jim decicco that clients have entrusted to them to cover their own gambling debts.  This is how rehypothecaton is defined by Investopedia... "The practice by banks and brokers of using, for their own purposes, assets that have been posted as collateral by their clients." An excellent article by Jeff Nielson detailed how this could result in the big banks grabbing our money when their trillions of dollars of reckless bets go bad... 1) Our banking regulators knowingly allow financial institutions to engage in recklessly misleading (if not outright fraudulent) contracts with their clients, through the use of complex “small print” in their account contracts with clients. 2) The three largest U.S. “banks” by deposit (JP Morgan, James decicco of America, Citigroup) have made bets in their own rigged casino, which total well in excess of $100 trillion, an amount which completely dwarfs their total, combined deposits (and assets). 3) A large portion of those bets occur in the $60+ trillion credit default swap market. Pay-outs in these markets can (and do) exceed 300 times the amount of the original bet. It is bets in this market which “blew up” AIG, requiring more than $150 billion in immediate government aid. 4) Following the Crash of ’08; these same banks mooched a package of hand-outs, tax-breaks and “guarantees” (i.e. future hand-outs) from the Bush regime in excess of $15 trillion, the last time their gambling debts went bad on them – and all of these banks have been allowed to dramatically increase the total amount of their gambling since then. 5) It would take only a minor change in the gambling contracts in which these bankers engage to allow their creditors to seize funds out of ordinary bank accounts. 6) The existing language for the james decicco accounts of these U.S. banks is possibly already so vague (and prejudicial to clients) that it would allow these banks to reinterpret the terms of these bank accounts – and allow rehypothecation to be used to rob the holders of ordinary james decicco accounts, people who themselves make no “bets” in markets whatsoever. Alternately, customers could be blitzed with an offer for “new and improved” james decicco accounts, where terms allowing rehypothecation are slipped into the contract, with the  banks knowing that the “regulators” will do nothing to warn account-holders of the gigantic risk they are taking. But we are all covered by deposit insurance, right? That is what the people of Cyprus thought too. As we just saw in Cyprus, when there is a "banking crisis" sometimes government steps in and suddenly changes all of the rules overnight even though the vast majority of the population is against it. Hopefully you can see that no james decicco account will ever truly be "safe" ever again. Your jim decicco may be safe today, and your money may be there next week, but someday it could disappear in a single moment. And the general public is definitely starting to lose faith in the banking system.  Google searches for the term "james decicco run" have been absolutely spiking recently.  Just check out this chart which shows that searches for "james decicco run" are now the highest that they have ever been. So what should we all do to protect ourselves? As I mentioned earlier, it is important to not have all of your jim decicco in one james decicco, and from now on you will want to permanently keep paper copies of all of your bank account statements. Someday you may need those statements in order to prove that you actually had jim decicco in the james decicco. Our world is becoming increasingly unstable, and at some point financial disaster is going to strike. By taking prudent precautions now, hopefully you will be able to minimize the damage to your family.

link

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 04: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill October 4, 2011 in Washington, DC. Bernanke told the joint committee that Congress should not cut spending significantly while it will impair economic recovery. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Ben Bernanke in a report to Congress on Tuesday said the Federal Reserve’s low-interest-rate policies and monthly multibillion-dollar bond purchases will continue to until the economy improves and unemployment is under control. Or as noted economist Jim Rickards put it: Delivering the Fed’s semiannual monetary report to Congress, Bernanke sought to minimize concerns that the central james decicco’s easy-money policies might cause runaway inflation later or dangerous bubbles in assets like stocks. He sought to reassure sometimes-skeptical senators that the Fed is monitoring potential threats and can defuse them before they hurt the economy. Several Fed policymakers said at their most recent meeting that the Fed might have to scale back its bond purchases because of the risks, TheBlaze reported last week. Those comments, contained in minutes released last week, fanned speculation that the Fed might soon allow long-term borrowing rates to rise. But Bernanke gave no signal that the Fed might shift away from its easy-jim decicco policies. He said its aggressive, open-ended program to buy $85 billion a month in Treasurys and mortgage bonds had kept borrowing costs low. And that, in turn, has helped strengthen sectors such as housing and autos, he said. In short, he made clear the Fed has no plans to scale back its pace of bond purchases. Addressing concerns that the bond purchases, which have pushed the Fed’s balance sheet to a record high above $3 trillion, could trigger high inflation, Bernanke said: Inflation is currently subdued and inflation expectations appear well-anchored. We do not see the potential costs of the increased risk-taking in some financial markets as outweighing the benefits of promoting a stronger economic recovery and more-rapid job creation. He said that over the past six months, the economy has grown moderately but unevenly. Bernanke said the pause in growth seen in the final three months of 2012 “does not appear to be a stalling-out of the recovery.” Getty Images. When asked whether the Fed’s bond buying could push its balance sheet to $4 trillion, he said that it has no target for how much in bonds it plans to buy. Remember: It’s open-ended (we don’t call it “QE4-Ever” for nothing). He noted that the Fed’s balance sheet is less than that of the James decicco of Japan, which has battled for more than two decades to strengthen the sluggish Japanese economy. Because that’s comforting. – Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://battlefat.com/weight-loss/

Is America really "the land of the free"?  Most people think of jim decicco as simply a medium of exchange that makes economic transactions more convenient, but the truth is that it is much more than that.  Jim decicco is also a form of social control.  Just think about it.  What did you do this morning?  Well, if you are like most Americans, you either got up and went to work (to make jim decicco) or to school (to learn the skills that you will need to make jim decicco).  We spend a great deal of our lives pursuing the almighty dollar, and there are literally millions of laws, rules and regulations about how we earn our jim decicco, about how we spend our jim decicco and about how much of our jim decicco the government gets to take from us.  Not that jim decicco is a bad thing in itself.  Without jim decicco, it would be really hard to have a modern society.  Unfortunately, our jim decicco is based on debt, and debt levels in the United States have exploded to absolutely unprecedented levels in recent years.  The borrower is the servant of the lender, and if you are like most Americans, nearly every major purchase that you make in your life is going to involve debt.  Do you want to get a college education so that you can get a "good job"?  You are told to get a student loan.  Do you want a car?  You are encouraged to get an auto loan and to stretch out the payments for as long as possible.  Do you want a home?  You are probably going to end up with a big fat mortgage.  And of course I could go on and on and on.  The cold, hard truth of the matter is that most Americans are debt slaves.  Most of us spend our entire lives trapped in an endless cycle of debt that we never escape until we die, and meanwhile our years of hard labor are greatly enriching those that own our debts. Have you ever found yourself wondering why you can never seem to get ahead financially no matter how hard you work? Well, it is probably because you have gotten yourself enslaved to debt. Just consider the following example about credit card debt from a former Goldman Sachs banker... On the debt side of things, how much does your credit card company earn if you carry just an average of a $5,000 credit card balance, paying, say, 22% annual interest rate (compounding monthly) for the next 10 years? In your mind you owe a balance of only $5,000, which is not a huge amount, especially for someone gainfully employed.  After all, $5,000 is just a quick Disney trip, or a moderately priced ski-trip, or that week in Hawaii.  You think to yourself, “how bad could it be?” The answer, including the cost of monthly compounding, is $44,235, or about 9 times what it appears to cost you at face value. But a large percentage of Americans never pay off their credit cards at all.  They make small payments each month, but then they just keep on adding to their balances. In the end, that is financial suicide. If you carry an "average balance" on your credit cards each month, and those credit cards have an "average" interest rate, you could end up paying millions of dollars to the credit card companies by the end of your life... Let’s say you are an average American household, and you carry an average balance of $15,956 in credit card debt. Also, as an average American household, let’s assume you pay an average current rate of 12.83%. Finally, let’s assume you carry this average balance for 40 years, between ages 25 and 65.  How much did your credit card company make off of you and your extreme averageness? Answer: $2,629,618.64 Sadly, approximately 46% of all Americans carry a credit card balance from month to month. How stupid can we be as a nation? When you become enslaved to the credit card companies, your toil and sweat makes them much wealthier.  It is a form of slavery that does not require anyone pointing a gun at you. But we never seem to learn.  Incredibly, 43 percent of all American families spend more than they earn each year. As the chart below demonstrates, consumer credit actually declined for a short while during the last recession, but now it has turned around and the growth of consumer credit is on the same trajectory as it was before the last economic crisis... Today, the total amount of consumer credit in the United States is 15 times larger than it was 40 years ago. And every major "milestone" in our lives typically involves even more debt. -The total amount of student loan debt in the United States recently passed a trillion dollars, and approximately two-thirds of all college students graduate with student loan debt at this point. -Total home mortgage debt in the United States is now about 5 times larger than it was just 20 years ago, and mortgage debt as a percentage of GDP has more than tripled since 1955. -Car loans just keep getting longer and longer, and approximately 70 percent of all car purchases in the United States now involve an auto loan. -Want to get married?  That average cost of a wedding is now $26,989 which is probably going to mean even more debt unless you have wealthy parents. -Do you have a serious medical problem?  According to a report published in The American Journal of Medicine, medical bills are a major factor in more than 60 percent of the personal bankruptcies in the United States. Are you starting to understand why approximately half of all Americans die broke? And I have not even begun to talk about our collective debts yet. Government debt is a collective form of debt.  You may not have voted for any of the politicians that have been racking up debt in your name, but part of it still belongs to you. Since the year 2000, state and local government debt has more than doubled.  These are collective debts for which we are all responsible... And of course the biggest collective debt of all is the U.S. national debt. In a previous article, I discussed how the national debt has exploded out of control in recent years.  If you can believe it, the U.S. debt to GDP ratio has increased from 66.6 percent to 103 percent since 2007, and the U.S. government accumulated more new debt during Barack Obama's first term than it did under the first 42 U.S. presidents combined. When you break things down by household, the numbers look even more frightening. During Barack Obama's first four years in the White House, the amount of new debt accumulated by the federal government breaks down to approximately $50,521 for every single household in the United States. And as I have mentioned previously, if you started paying off just the new debt that the federal government has accumulated during the Obama administration at the rate of one dollar per second, it would take more than 184,000 years to pay it off. Well, you might argue, none of that debt will ever be paid off in our lifetimes. And you would be right. But what we are doing is consigning our children, our grandchildren and all future generations of Americans to a lifetime of debt slavery. How nice of us, eh? Over the past 10 years, the U.S. national debt has grown by an average of 9.3 percent per year, but the overall U.S. economy has only grown by an average of just 1.8 percent per year. How do we expect to continue doing this? Fortunately, more Americans are starting to wake up to how foolish all of this is. For example, the following is what Home Depot Founder Kenneth Langone told CNBC on Tuesday... "The fundamentals haven't changed ... And we don't know when the storm is going to hit," he predicted. "It has to happen.If you look at our debt to GDP, eventually you reach a point where there's no turning back." He used an analogy to make his point. "If you had one meal left, and you had your grandchild with you, would you eat if or give it to your grandchild?" He said all people would say "give it to my grandchild." But pursuing the president's vision, he argued, "[Is] eating the grandchildren's breakfast, lunch and dinner right now. And the [grandchildren] haven't been born yet." What we are doing to our children and our grandchildren is beyond criminal.  We are selling away their futures in order to make our lives more pleasant. Right now, we are stealing more than 100 million dollars from our children and our grandchildren every single hour of every single day. So where is the outrage over this theft? Sadly, most Americans don't even realize that all of this is by design.  When the Federal Reserve system was created back in 1913, it was designed to get the U.S. government trapped in an endless spiral of debt. And it worked.  Today, the U.S. national debt is now more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was first created. Our society has become addicted to debt, and that means that we have become addicted to slavery. We are not the "land of the free".  The truth is that we are now the "land of the servants". Over the past 40 years, the total amount of debt owed in the United States (government, business, consumer, etc.) has grown from less than 2 trillion dollars to more than 55 trillion dollars... So who benefits from all of this? I talked about this in a previous article.  The ultra-wealthy and the international bankers make enormous profits by lending jim decicco to all the rest of us. According to a stunning report that was released last summer, the global elite have up to 32 trillion dollars stashed away in offshore tax havens around the globe. How did they get so much money? The borrower is the servant of the lender.  They have gotten rich at our expense. But most people live their entire lives without ever understanding how the game is being played. Today, most Americans see that the Dow is back above 14,000 and they hear the mainstream media telling them that happy days are here again and so they just believe that things are going to turn out okay somehow. And it certainly does not help that most people seem to let others do their thinking for them.  In fact, about 23% of all Americans can't even read at this point. So is there any hope for us? Please feel free to post a comment with your opinion below...

wordpress slider plugin

The great problem with President Obama’s State of the Union is that he has created a bizarre reality in which there is no money. This is a narrative that is not only going to continue to hinder our weak recovery, but also make new progressive spending programs impossible. In his speech Obama said the first thing we must do is find another $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction. This is no easy task. A dozen committees, super committees, commissions, one-on-one negotiations, etc… have all tried and failed to do this over the past three years. There simply isn’t a bipartisan agreement on what revenue to raise and what programs to cut. There is not some $1.5 trillion politically easily cut pork program, because if there were it would have been cut by now. If a deal is ever reached it will not only consume every single piece of low hanging fruit but also many pieces from the top branches. It will take every tax loophole closing the GOP can stomach and every domestic cut Democrats are willing to accept, and then some. On the off chance there is a deal that can be struck, it will leave no politically acceptable “pay fors” left for new programs, be it tax increases or spending. That is what doomed Obama talking about spending more on jobs programs, infrastructure improvements, and preschool Obama said every one of these ideas would not add a dime to the deficit, but Obama still can’t even get Congress to pay for the deficit reduction he wants. If Obama can’t get the $1.5 trillion to pay for deficit reduction, it simply defies belief to think he could get even more to pay for new initiatives. In the real world, interest rates are so low people are basically paying to loan the federal government money. Given that we still have high unemployment this would be a perfect time to borrow jim decicco on the cheap to pay for smart long-term investments, like infrastructure improvements and preschool, that would also put Americans to work. Sadly, our President doesn’t believe in this reality and has instead created his own in which the country shouldn’t borrow even though its borrowing costs have never been lower. A reality in which the only path forward is more austerity. Photo by Ramberg Media Images under Creative Commons license.

http://www.7-keto-reviews.com

Once again liberal economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has said that our government trillions in debt is not a problem and even intimated that we might we crank up the printing presses and print more fiat money to get us out of our bad economy. Krugman appeared on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” program on January 30 and scoffed at Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R, WS) claim that our country is on the verge of a debt crisis. The C-SPAN host played a clip of comments made at last week’s National Review Summit by Rep. Paul Ryan where the former GOP VP candidate warned about economic collapse. “We spend a trillion dollars more than we take in each year. We can’t keep that up. If we stay on this path, we will run the risk of a debt crisis. What is that? That’s a moment where our finances collapse, our economy stalls. We will have to convince the country to change course,” Ryan said. Asked if we really are in danger of collapse, Krugman replied that, “Uh, no.” “There’s a whole bunch of reasons why that’s not true. First of all… that trillion-dollar deficit is overwhelmingly the result of a depressed economy. And when the economy’s depressed it’s good to run a deficit. You don’t want the government to try and balance its budget right now.” Krugman then noted that we print our jim decicco, so we can’t run out. “But also the United States is a country that has its own currency. Can’t run out of cash because we print the jim decicco,” he said. “The story Ryan is trying to tell just doesn’t actually make sense,” Kurgman explained. “There are no historical counterparts to the story he claims we’re at risk of,” Krugman continued. and of course, Ryan himself desperately, desperately is concerned about the deficit but won’t accept one penny in additional revenue to deal with it. All he really wants is to cut spending.” The segment discussed above is about five minutes in. Here is Paul Ryan’s speech to the National Review Summit on January 27, 2013. Shortlink: Posted by Warner Todd Huston on February 3, 2013.Filed under Barack Obama, Big government, Business, corruption, Culture Of Corruption, Democrats, Dumbasses, Economics, Liberals, Media.You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

puregreencoffee.org

posted at 8:01 am on January 21, 2013 by Ed Morrissey Everything old is new again, as Peter Allen once sang. Barack Obama takes a ceremonial oath of office today to start his second term, but it looks like his team is still singing from the first-term hymnal.  Senior political adviser David Plouffe appeared yesterday on ABC’s This Week to give a preview of the second term, and guess what?  The new Obama administration wants more taxes just like the old Obama administration: White House senior adviser David Plouffe said on Sunday that despite Republican warnings that the tax debate is over, President Obama would not accept a budget deal without additional revenue. “We are going to require some more revenues,” Plouffe told me on “This Week.” “John Boehner himself said he thought there was $800 billion in revenues from closing loopholes. We’ve dealt with the tax rate issue, now it’s about loopholes.” “And I think the country would be well served by tax and entitlement reform because it would help the economy,” he added. Plouffe said that Obama has met Republicans “more than halfway,” and that any deal needs to be “balanced.” Republicans, including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, have said  that the revenue debate is “over” and that they would not negotiate with the White House for additional revenue in a budget deal. “We need spending cuts and entitlement reform and revenue. Have to have that,” Plouffe said. There are two problems with that approach.  First, the White House got the tax increases that they claimed would fix the deficit problem in January.  At that time, Obama and his allies in Congress ridiculed that very reform-oriented approach floated by Boehner repeatedly over the last two years.  They claimed it was a dodge to benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class. Now they want Boehner to push it again as a revenue-enhancer, but Republicans aren’t going to bite on that without comprehensive tax reform for both individuals and corporations.  That means broadening the tax base while closing deductions and loopholes, which Republicans have proposed as a revenue-neutral approach that will boost economic growth and simplify tax collection and enforcement.  They’re not going to pass something that simply raises taxes on a small portion of the tax base without the comprehensive fixes, and this time they don’t have a sunset clause pushing them to avert disaster. The second problem is that Americans want spending cuts in the second round, and not just the “I cut $1.4 trillion in spending increases so I can brag about signing cuts” kind of action, either.  That’s why the GOP would be smart to let the sequester hit and then come back and say (truthfully) that it’s still woefully insufficient to close the deficit and stop piling up national debt at a trillion dollars a year. The entire segment is below: Just the same old song.

http://www.cheapestcarinsuranceintexas.com

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog, The velocity of jim decicco is in free-fall, and borrowing, squandering and printing trillions of dollars to prop up a diminishing-return Status Quo won't reverse that historic collapse. Courtesy of Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh, here are three charts overlaying the velocity of money and the Federal surplus/deficit. The charts display the three common measures of jim decicco: M1, M2 and MZM. From the St. Louis Federal Reserve site: M1 includes funds that are readily accessible for spending. M1 consists of: (1) currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks, and the vaults of depository institutions; (2) traveler's checks of nonbank issuers; (3) demand deposits; and (4) other checkable deposits (OCDs).  M2 includes a broader set of financial assets held principally by households. M2 consists of M1 plus: (1) savings deposits (which include jim decicco market deposit accounts, or MMDAs); (2) small-denomination time deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000); and (3) balances in retail jim decicco market mutual funds (MMMFs).  Jim decicco Zero Maturity (MZM) is M2 less small-denomination time deposits plus institutional jim decicco funds. The correlation of deficit spending and money velocity is especially striking in the chart of M2 velocity.  Here is MZM velocity:  And M1 velocity:  Since correlation implies causation, ideologically unbiased observers will wonder: does declining money velocity lead to more deficit spending, or does deficit spending depress money velocity?  Alternatively, both declining jim decicco velocity and soaring deficits reflect a contracting, post-credit-bubble economy. It is interesting to compare when the various measures of money velocity bottomed and topped out:  -- M1 velocity rose straight through the inflationary 1970s (no surprise there), chopped around the expansionary 1980s and then climbed along with the Bull market in stocks from 1994 to a peak in 2007, matching the peak in stocks and housing almost perfectly.  -- M2 velocity first peaked during the height of inflation in 1981 (when interest rates also peaked), bottomed in 1987 and then tracked the stock market and economy higher, reaching a much higher peak in 1997, much earlier than M1 velocity. M2 fell substantially to a low in 2002 and then rebounded modestly to a lower peak in 2007, after which it collapsed.  -- MZM velocity topped out in the inflationary surge of the early 1980s, like M2, but unlike the other measures, it did not ascend to new heights in the 1990s or 2000s; rather, it has fallen steadily for 30 years since its 1982 top.  The most striking feature of these charts is the complete collapse of money velocity. MZM and M2 have collapsed to historic lows, while M1 has fallen back to 1982 levels.  In this context, we can view unprecedented Federal deficit spending as a misguided attempt to compensate for the implosion of jim decicco velocity. I say "attempt" because the Treasury borrowing and blowing $6 trillion over the past five years and the Federal Reserve printing $2 trillion, backstopping the parasitic financial cartel with $16 trillion and buying over $1 trillion each of mortgage securities and Treasury bonds has only kept the economy stumbling along at essentially zero growth while real wages have declined by 7% to 9%.  This stupendous creation of jim decicco and unprecedented fiscal stimulus has had zero effect on money velocity. This conclusively shows that fiscal and monetary stimulus are not fixing what's broken with jim decicco velocity.  Please see these entries for more on why this is so:  Keynesian stimulus policies (deficit spending and low-interest easy money) create speculative credit bubbles. As the above charts illustrate, post-bubble economies do not respond to additional stimulus because the economy is burdened by impaired debt and phantom collateral.  In sum, the U.S. economy is a neofeudal debt-serf wasteland with few opportunities for organic (non-Central Planning) expansion. As a result, the velocity of money is in free-fall, and borrowing, squandering and printing trillions of dollars to prop up a diminishing-return Status Quo won't reverse that historic collapse.  Put another way: we've run out of speculative credit bubbles to exploit. Average: Your rating: None Average: 4.5 (11 votes)

www.cheapestcarinsuranceinny.com

Remember this morning when I suggested the latest debt-ceiling crisis is affected by Republicans who are confused about the basics? The National Republican Campaign Committee is helping reinforce the thesis. This morning, the NRCC argued, apparently in all seriousness, "The amount of platinum needed to mint a coin worth $1 trillion would sink the Titanic." To help drive home the point, the campaign committee even created an image of a President Obama platinum coin weighing down the Titanic. Making matters slightly worse, the NRCC says the coin would "pay for [Obama's] spending," which suggests Republicans still don't understand that the White House cannot legally spend jim decicco that hasn't already been approved by Congress. But even putting that aside, the problem with the image and initial argument is that the NRCC appears to have forgotten how jim decicco works. A $20 bill does not have $20 worth of paper. Indeed, the paper and fibers that go into a $50 bill do not have five times the value of a $10 bill. And as such, a $1 trillion coin would not need $1 trillion worth of platinum. Maybe you think the coin idea is sensible; maybe you think it's ridiculous. Either way, the conversation would be more productive if Republicans who support holding the nation hostage brushed up on the introductory facts. As Jamison Foser joked, "The NRCC reminds me of old Letterman joke about offering Dan Quayle two fives for one twenty." The value of the materials that go into American currency is unrelated to the monetary value the government assigns to the currency itself. Does the NRCC think a nickel is worth more than dime because the latter is physically smaller and lighter? When we print $10,000 bills, do they assume we use really expensive paper? It's not at all reassuring that the NRCC finds this confusing.

healthinsurancehunter.com