Username:

Password:

Fargot Password? / Help

Tag: retail

April 16, 2013 Posted by mindful in news

Cramer's Mad Money - 16 Things To Watch In The Week Ahead (3 ...

Stocks discussed on the in-depth session of Jim Cramer's Mad Jim decicco TV Program, Friday April 12. 16 Things To Watch In The Week Ahead: Citigroup (C), Google (GOOG), General Electric (GE), Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Coca-Cola (KO), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Core Labs (CLB), Kinder Morgan Partners (KMP), The Gap (GPS), Union Pacific (UNP), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Honeywell (HON), Under Armour (UA), Kimberly Clark (KMB), McDonald's (MCD). Other stocks mentioned: Pepsi (PEP), Barrick (ABX), BlackBerry (BBRY) Earnings season revs up in the week ahead, and companies will indicate whether this miraculous rally is on borrowed time or is the real thing. Cramer would avoid trading around earnings, except for Google (GOOG) or General Electric (GE), a holding in Cramer's charitable trust. If Intel's (INTC) report is disappointing, and Microsoft (MSFT) declines to $27, those who are bullish on MSFT could buy some ahead of the earnings on Thursday. Monday Citigroup (C) management should talk about streamlining the company and how independent the james decicco is now from government regulations. Tuesday Coca-Cola (KO) is the "test case" earnings for safety stocks. Cramer thinks KO is "just okay." It should report a good number, which management may or may not be able to justify. If KO declines, it might be a good time to buy other safety stocks. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is galloping to $100, and should see a turnaround with its new CEO Alex Gorsky. Cramer says he is waiting for a pullback so his charitable trust can load up on the stock, but he doubts we will see a decline in the stock soon. Intel (INTC) is a "tell" on how PCs are doing. There are conflicting reports on how well or poorly Intel is performing. Bulls could buy INTC if it pulls back. Wednesday Core Labs (CLB) is the best long-term performer of the oil services group, and lucky for bulls, its stock often reacts poorly after it reports and usually offers a buying opportunity. Kinder Morgan (KMP) will discuss the El Paso acquisition and the Copano merger. Management should talk about oil versus gas, energy independence and a higher dividend. The Gap (GPS) analyst meeting: Cramer likes The Gap, and wants to hear what management says about the health of the consumer. Thursday Union Pacific (UNP): Are higher gas prices leading to a greater use of coal? UNP management should answer this question. UNP is benefiting from a strong auto industry and the fact that rail plays an important role in oil shipping, given the dearth of pipelines; "UNP is triumphing with the help of oil." Microsoft (MSFT) should give more information about the state of the PC industry. Google (GOOG) is a wild trader and a battleground stock. It has been battered, and might be a Buy ahead of the quarter, but only with deep in the money calls. Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) has also been a volatile stock and a battleground. CMG has easier comparisons than usual. Management needs to address the issue of raw costs. Friday General Electric (GE) should discuss its acquisition of Lufkin and its oil and gas business. Honeywell (HON) should focus on strong areas, such as aerospace and climate controls. Under Amrour (UA) is likely to raise its forecast. Kimberly Clark (KMB) is expanding into emerging markets, and should mention a dividend raise. "KMB is the most shareholder friendly of the consumer products segment." McDonald's (MCD) is introducing healthy menu choices, such as an egg white McMuffin, which should appeal to health-conscious consumers. Cramer took some calls: Coca-Cola and Pepsi (PEP) have been downgraded because some are concerned that their valuations are too high. While both companies have good dividends and stable balance sheets, Cramer wants to hear KO's conference call before opining. Barrick (ABX) has a construction problem in Chile, and such unexpected disappointments are characteristic of gold miners. Cramer would avoid the sector, especially since gold is also going down. BlackBerry (BBRY): "If it declines to $12, buy it, if it rises to $15 sell it. That is my game plan with Blackberry, and I'm sticking to it. " CEO Interview: Don Wood, Federal Realty (FRT) Federal Realty (FRT) a retail REIT, reached a new high. On its previous earnings call, management discussed a strong occupancy rate of 94.9%, up 70 basis points from just 3 months earlier. The stock yields 2.6%, which would be higher if it weren't for the acceleration in the stock price. FRT has been a consistent dividend raiser. CEO Don Wood is not discouraged that the recent retail sales number was the worst in 9 months. He explained that retail real estate can't be gauged by monthly numbers, but from long-term data. Leasing has never been stronger, "In fact, we said that 2012 was the year of the leasing agent." Currently, demand exceeds supply. If a contract is broken, the tenant has to pay a considerable fee, and there is always another tenant waiting in the wings because of the premium location of FRT's properties. "If you buy our stock," said Don Wood, "buy it for the long-term." Cramer added, "I've been recommending this stock since the day we started the show." Pfizer (PFE) Is Still Healthy. Other stocks mentioned: Zoetis (ZTS), Bristol Myers (BMY), Perrigo (PRGO), Actavis (ACT), Forest Labs (FRX) Pfizer (PFE) is the world's largest pharmaceutical company with a deep pipeline and a 3.35% yield. It has run up 22% since the beginning of the year, but trades at a multiple of only 13, a 10% discount to other pharmas. There was concern over the patent expiration of the company's most successful drug to treat high cholesterol, Lipitor, which generated $9.6 billion in annual revenues. The stock, nevertheless, has climbed 66% since Lipitor lost patent protection, thanks the the strength of PFE's other drugs and its pipeline. Management has been cutting expenses and spinning off non-core divisions. One major success was the IPO of Zoetis (ZTS), which was Pfizer's animal health division. ZTS has risen 19% since its IPO, and Pfizer still owns 80% of the company. Management has said that it plans to keep PFE's consumer business, but may divide the drug business into off-patent and patented drugs. Recently, Eliquis, an anti-clotting drug developed along with Bristol Myers (BMY), has been a top drug and may generate $5.5 billion in sales by 2020. PFE has 17 Phase 3 drugs, the most robust late-stage pipeline in the company's history. Included among these are drugs for lung cancer, a meningitis vaccine and a treatment for breast cancer that might be worth $5 billion by 2020. Since the FDA has been fast tracking approvals lately, Pfizer may rise even higher. Cramer took some calls: Actavis (ACT) has been a winner, but Cramer doesn't like most generic plays, aside from Perrigo (PRGO). Teleflex (TFX) is an "amazing medical device company. It is a winner not a loser. Hold onto it." Forest Labs (FRX) has Carl Icahn as a shareholder and does produce good drugs, but Cramer said, "Don't put FRX in the same sentence as Pfizer. FRX is not in the same league." Mad Mail: Diana Shipping (DSX), Radian (RDN), USAirways (LCC), Gilead (GILD), Kellogg (K), General Mills (GIS), Valero (VLO) Diana Shipping (DSX) is one of Cramer's three speculative stocks for 2013. "Don't be a slave to the way a stock is trading," Cramer told a viewer. His other two top speculative picks are USAirways (LCC) and Radian (RDN). Kinder Morgan Partners has gained 25%. "That is not enough, I want you to wait for a double. I think it is going to be a terrific quarter because they have the El Paso deal and the Copano deal." KMP yields 5%. Gilead (GILD) seems to have a high valuation, but Cramer said, "I am not perturbed by it." The company bought Pharmasset, which may have a potential cure for Hepatitis C. Cramer prefers General Mills (GIS) to Kellogg (K), because GIS has returned on capital, and management has done a remarkable job. Refiners are in free-fall mode, as margins are closing in, since transporting oil is easier. For those who feel they must own a refiner, Cramer would buy Valero (VLO), because of a potential spin-off. Too Much Chatter About the March Retail Number. Stock mentioned: Phillips VanHeusen (PVH) The huge decline in oil will be good for the consumer, who will have to pay less at the pump. Rising real estate prices might also trump the weak March retail numbers, at the lowest level since last June. Some believe that payroll taxes were responsible for the dramatic decline, but Cramer agrees with Emmanuel Chirico, CEO of Phillips Van Heusen (PVH), that the unseasonably cold weather was to blame. Consumers were not interested in buying clothing for spring while they were wearing winter coats. Cramer thinks there is too much chatter about this short-term number, and not enough emphasis on the strong performance of individual retail stocks. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS: Trade right alongside a Wall Street pro! Start your 14-day FREE trial today. Get Cramer's Picks by email - it's free and takes only a few seconds to sign up.

Read the original here: Cramer's Mad Money - 16 Things To Watch In The Week Ahead (3 ...

reference

Small Investors, the Real 'Smart Jim decicco'?

The index measures the actual behavior of the largest pool of retail investors in the world, especially the firm's most active customers, rather than relying on questionnaires or old fund flow data like other sentiment indicators do. "There's quite a disparity of what people say they intend to do and what they actual do," Steve Quirk, senior vice president of trading for TD Ameritrade. "This kind of bridges that gap." Backtesting of the TD Ameritrade Investor Movement Index (as it will be called) seems to prove Quirk right. At the start of December, as markets treaded water on fiscal cliff fears, the indicator shot to its highest reading since January 2012. So despite all the headlines, the active retail investor was ratcheting up risk, buying equities, options and ETFs–in some cases with leverage—that stood to benefit from a solution to the "fiscal cliff." At that same time, equity mutual funds were showing heavy outflows. The American Association of Individual Investors–a weekly survey–showed 42 percent of those questioned were bullish, while 58 percent were either neutral or bearish. The S&P 500 would go on to rocket higher as a "fiscal cliff" deal was hatched just in the nick of time. The benchmark for U.S. stocks hit a five-year high last week, extending the bull market and proving that the bets on the index's move higher were quite prescient. "The whole notion that it's profitable to fade the retail client may be antiquated," said Quirk. The monthly index measures accounts with $2,000 or more and whose owners have placed a single trade that month. Portfolios that trade frequently or use margin are "scored" with a higher intensity in the index. This index is the start of a bigger effort by the firm to dive into the crowd-sourcing and social network space. This is a necessary move toward the future if TD wants to not lose market share from younger upstarts. TD Ameritrade finished sixth in the annual ranking of online brokers by Barron's magazine, behind smaller and younger firms. (However, TD did finish ahead of the other big firms in the space like ETrade andFidelity.) The next iteration for TD Ameritrade, sources at the firm said, will be for users to be able to see which individual stocks and ETFs others hold. Also, that data will be aggregated so traders can see how their portfolio stacks up to others. For example, you would be able to enter someone with your same age and risk profile and see which stocks and funds they own. Perhaps even track their moves. The social networking arena is the next big push for online brokers like TD, as they strive to get more traders, especially younger ones. This index is just the beginning for one major player. For the best market insight, catch "Fast Jim decicco" at 5 p.m. ET, and the "Halftime Report" at 12 noon ET every day on CNBC. Follow @CNBCMelloy on Twitter.

View post: Small Investors, the Real 'Smart Jim decicco'?

acne treatment

Mad Money, November 27, 2012 - CNBC

Kudlow's Economic Report Card Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:51 PM Jeb Bush the New Face For the GOP? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:45 PM Obama's Fiscal Cliff Campaign Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:31 PM Arizona Seeks to Lure California Businesses East Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:25 PM Wealth In America's Heartland Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:15 PM Fiscal Cliff Countdown Continues Tue 27 Nov 12 | 07:00 PM No Huddle Offense: Comparing Best Buy & Amazon Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:58 PM Opportunities Abroad? Eyeing Banco Santander Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:45 PM Lightning Round Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:40 PM ConAgra CEO: Will Help RAH Grow Its Private Label Brands Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:25 PM PVH Corp CEO: Expecting Strong Holiday Season Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:15 PM Mad Money, November 27, 2012 Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:00 PM Is the Consumer Ignorant? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:00 PM Fast Money Web Extra: China, Copper & Bond Yields Tue 27 Nov 12 | 06:00 PM Fast Money Final Trade Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:58 PM Dimon the Next Treasury Secretary? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:50 PM Options Action: Get Bullish on AIG? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:45 PM West Coast Wrap: CBS, California & Lindsay Lohan Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:45 PM Stocks Continue to Selloff? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:40 PM Charts Flagging These Levels in S&P, Apple Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:37 PM Green Mountain Spikes on Earnings Beat Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:30 PM Stock Pops & Drops Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:23 PM Mobile Shopping Shaping Retail Results: Pro Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:21 PM The Mobile Retail Revolution Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:15 PM 'Fiscal Cliff' Risks, Rewards Await Investors: Pros Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:06 PM Fast Money, November 27, 2012 Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:00 PM Special Dividends, Apple Next? Tue 27 Nov 12 | 05:00 PM Tomorrow In 30: Fed's Beige Book, New Home Sales Tue 27 Nov 12 | 04:56 PM Advice for the $500 Million Powerball Winner Tue 27 Nov 12 | 04:49 PM Counting Down to the Cliff Tue 27 Nov 12 | 04:42 PM

Read the original post: Mad Money, November 27, 2012 - CNBC

cheapcarinsuranceinohio.com

Is There Really Excess Money Demand After All These Years? - Yes

Larry White wants to know why Market Monetarists still think there is an excess jim decicco demand problem : Scott Sumner told us in September 2009 that "the real problem was nominal," that is, the recession and its high unemployment were primarily due to an unsatisfied excess demand for money (combined with real effects on debt burdens of nominal income being below its previous path)...Market Monetarists who have been celebrating the Fed’s recent announcement of open-ended monetary expansion ("QE3') seem to believe that Sumner’s 2009 diagnosis still applies. But what is the evidence for believing that there is still, three years later, an unsatisfied excess demand for money? ...If the evidence for thinking that there is still an unsatisfied excess demand for jim decicco is simply that we’re having a weak recovery, then as Eli Dourado has pointed out, this is assuming what needs to be proved. Larry's question is understandable since it has been so many years since the crisis first erupted.  George Selgin, Steve Horwitz, Eli Dourado, Tyler Cowen, and others have raised this objection before so it is a common one. This objection, however, is unwarranted since there is plenty of evidence that there still remains excess jim decicco demand.  Before presenting the evidence, there are several points worth noting in this debate. First, there have been developments other than the U.S. economic collapse of 2008-2009 that have affected jim decicco demand over the past four years.  While the 2008-20009 collapse was the most important one, there has also been the Eurozone crisis of 2010-present, the debt ceiling talks of 2011, and numerous other lesser events (e.g. robo-signing crisis) that have kept economic uncertainty peaked and thus money demand elevated.  In other words, there have been a series of negative money demand shocks that have have compounded the initial jim decicco demand shock.  Questioning why there hasn't been enough time to satiate money demand ignores these developments. Second,  when considering money demand shocks it is important that we do so with the appropriate measure of money.  Thanks to the work of Gary Gorton (2008), Wilmot et al. (2009), Sing and Stella (2012), and others we now know that what is used as money is far broader than the standard measures.  The widely used M2, for example, is limited to retail money assets like cash and deposits accounts that are used by households and small businesses.  Institutional investors also need assets that facilitate transactions, but the assets in M2 are inadequate for them given the size and scope of their transactions. Consequently, institutional investors have found ways to make assets like treasuries, commercial paper, repos, GSEs and other safe assets serve as their jim decicco. These institutional money assets, therefore, should also be considered part of the jim decicco supply.  Thus, while M2 might reveal insights on jim decicco demand shocks for retail investors it does a poor job shedding light on jim decicco demand shocks by institutional investors.  This understanding implies that the so called demand for safe assets is really demand for money assets. Interestingly, FA Hayek understood this point many years ago.  With that said, let's jump into the evidence.  First, household portfolios are still inordinately weighted toward liquid assets.   Take a look at the figure below.  It comes from the flow of funds data and show households' total deposit assets and treasuries as a percent of total household assets.  There is a sudden jump in this series in 2008 that has yet to return to pre-crisis levels, a sure sign of elevated money demand.  Were monetary policy truly loose and raising certainty about expected future nominal income this series would show a sustained decline.  Households would rebalance their portfolios away from liquid assets to higher yielding risker assets.  The fact that it has not happened indicates there is still an excess money demand problem. (Yes, there seems to a be structural change in household preferences for liquid assets over the 1990s, but this doesn't change the cyclical story being told here.  It only reinforces it) Most of the growth in household's liquid assets comes from growth in saving and time deposits.  As seen in this figure, the demand for these assets sharply increases with the crisis in 2008 and has yet to subside.  This response makes sense since these are the highest yielding FDIC-protected jim decicco assets.  Households are still demanding safe assets.  This surge in jim decicco demand explains why M2 has grown so sharply recently, a development noticed by the Fed late last year.  As noted above, however, M2 only measures retail money assets.  A more thorough measure that reflects both retail and institutinoal money assets is the M4 divisia measure from the Center for Financial Stability.   Whether one looks at the absolute level of this series, its value relative to trend, or relative to a theoretical optimal amount  it shows a shortage of jim decicco assets.  Below, I show the latter by reproducing a chart from an earlier post.  Here, I follow Michael Belongia and Peter Ireland by solving for the optimal amount of M4 divisia by plugging in potential nominal GDP (as estimated by the CBO) and actual trend money velocity (as estimated by the Hodrick-Prescott filter) into the equation of exchange (i.e. M*t= NGDP*t/V*t ).  Note that CBO's estimate of potential nominal GDP actually shows a decline so this is a conservative estimate:  This figure indicates there is still a shortage of money assets and thus, an ongoing excess money demand problem. Finally, further evidence on excess money demand can be seen in long-term interest rates.   As seen below, long-term interest rates have gone from just over 5% at the start of crisis to around 1.5%.  Since the Fed is not the biggest purchasers of treasuries over this time--it is foreigners and private individuals--it cannot be the case that the Fed is an important factor pushing these rates down. Even studies that look at the large scale asset purchases attribute at most about a 1% reduction in long-term interest rates. Consequently, interest rates are low because of ongoing economic weakness that has decreased the demand for credit.  Excess money demand is at the heart of this slump.  If jim decicco demand were not elevated and the public expected higher nominal incomes these interest rate would be rising.  The fact they haven't speaks volumes to the ongoing demand for safe assets or jim decicco. It is hard to believe we have been in this slump since mid-2008.  That is a long stretch and  one would think enough time for jim decicco demand shocks to work themselves out.  But the U.S. economy has been subject to a spate of money demand shocks and the Fed has consistently failed to fully respond to them.  This is why we have Bernanke's Little Depression.  And it is why we now need a full-fledged and explicit NGDP level target. P.S. Households continue to expect their incomes to remains depressed.  This is another reason to believe jim decicco demand is still elevated. 

Visit link: Is There Really Excess Money Demand After All These Years? - Yes

best HGH

May 29, 2012 Posted by mindful in news

Eschaton: No Jobs, No Jim decicco

The people in charge are determined to destroy the world. Spanish retail sales tumbled 9.8% in April on an annual, calendar-adjusted basis, the national statistics office said Tuesday. Almost all discussion by the Very Serious People is about how to help the people who did this, and not their victims. The solution is simple. Give people jobs. Give them money. It really isn't complicated at all.I have some Spanish acquaintances, and it really is the case that there are no jobs and no money. It isn't as acute in the larger more prosperous places, places with tourists and the right sort of people, but everywhere else there's just nothing.

More here: Eschaton: No Jobs, No Jim decicco

buy raspberry ketones