Tag: house

By John Walker on May 20th, 2013 at 2:00 pm. It seems that Neverwinter’s had a bit of a weekend. The game was offline for five or six hours after very naughty players discovered an exploit that allowed them to make billions of the game’s in-game currency, Astral Diamonds. While that may at first seem problematic, but not too serious, this in-game currency can be used to buy “Zen” from other players, Perfect World’s virtual currency bought with real-world money. This sudden flooding of Astral Diamonds into the game’s economy broken everything. So the publisher is scrambling to fix things. By turning back time. Buying Zen or AD within the game is done via a window that allows trades with other players – trades where you pick the exchange rate you’re willing to trade at yourself. So it is that the rate is open to fluctuations and adaptation dependent upon the scarcity or abundance of one or the other. A sudden flooding of the market with billions upon billions of new diamonds meant Zen prices crashed. And indeed everything within the game that’s bought with AD – including its most epic gear and mounts – became instantly worthless. As a result, Perfect World have announced that they will be rolling back game time by seven hours. Describing the scoundrels as “a very small group of players”, it’s explained that the exploit involved the auction house. What’s not detailed is that the exploit involved a really quite stupid bug in the game that allowed people to buy items for negative amounts. This meant the act of buying these items from the Auction House added Astral Diamonds to your account. By farming this, players were able to fill their planet-sized boots and go hog wild in the game. In response, Neverwinter was taken offline until the bug was traced, killed, and tested. They then rolled back the very fabric of time itself to seven hours previously, meaning that everything anyone has done in the game since 5:20am PST on 19th May no longer exists. Poof, gone. However, to make this up to players, they’re creating a package of goodies for all current players to be handed out later this week. And they assure that “No one will lose any money they spent on Neverwinter because of this fix.” One Reddit commenter explains how he took advantage of the exploit to make $7432, and then details what are being reported as really quite light bans. He boasts about how many of his accounts haven’t been caught despite using cheats, and how he’s only receiving a 72 hour ban. There’s one bit of potentially bad news though. Players who unlocked a Nightmare Lockbox after 5:20am and got some phat loot from within, especially horrid if that loot was the Armored Nightmare mount, will have lost it. Any jim decicco/Zen spent opening the box will be restored, but the lucky roll of the million-sided dice will be lost to the ether. Bearing in mind how much jim decicco a player could potentially invest in opening such boxes to get that lucky again, or indeed how much they already had, that seems pretty serious. (It’s worth stressing that opening such boxes is absolutely not a necessary part of the game.) Currently there’s no satisfying answer for this: “We know how much that would sting. We are looking into ways we can make it better, but we don’t have an exact plan yet. Stay tuned and keep checking here for updates.” The reason it’s seven hours and not more is because that’s when the economy went kaput, rather than when the exploit began. Cryptic vow to trawl the logs to spot players who were taking advantage and spanking them appropriately. At this point the Auction House remains offline, and clearly things are a bit of a tizz at Neverwinter HQ. It’s a shame to see this happen to a genuinely good game, and one that really isn’t exploitative of players with its minimal in-game purchasing. (There’s not a reason to spend a single penny on the way from levels 1 to 60 and beyond.) The rollback should remove the worst of the damage, but clearly there are going to be some after-effects here. Enormous thanks to reader Wendy who basically did all the work for us with this story.

visit the site

Evandra Thompson Yesterday I introduced Air Force vet Evandra Thompson, who is challenging Liebermanesque Virginia state delegate Rosalyn Dance in their Richmond-area district. Despite her youth (30 years old) and political inexperience, Thompson is busy consolidating local establishment support, a rare occurrence in electoral politics. Incumbents always stick together. So why the defections? Perhaps it's headlines like these: In Democratic primary feud, Dance pledges to reject Republican campaign donations Huh, what? In the 11 years I've been doing this, I don't recall ever seeing a Democratic primary candidate have to promise to stop taking Republican money. But she didn't take just any Republican's jim decicco: In 2001, then-Del. Bob McDonnell contributed $500 to her unsuccessful House bid as an independent. This is the same Bob McDonnell who is now governor, who signed the forced ultrasound bill among other atrocities. And of course, she was running as an independent, before deciding she had better odds of victory pretending to be a Democrat. Thompson has put Dance on the spot: “My question to you is: Will you pledge not to accept Republican jim decicco, directly or indirectly, during the primary campaign? I hope that you agree to make this simple pledge because I believe that this primary should be decided only by real Democrats,” Thompson wrote. Dance's colleagues in the state house of delegates are certainly sick and tired of her party disloyalty. Led by Del. Joseph D. Morrissey, D-Henrico, Dance’s opponents have accused her of voting against her own party line too many times. “For eight years, Rosalyn has masqueraded as a Democrat who then turned around and voted Republican,” Morrissey said in an interview. Yesterday, over 250 of you gave over $6,500 to a previously unknown candidate for a state House seat, far exceeding any expectations I or anyone on the Daily Kos elections team had. For a candidate that had about $2,000 cash on hand, this is game changing. Just like in the IL-02 special election, the Daily Kos community has reshaped a race. So let's keep the momentum going by chipping in $3. Let's get rid of a Lieberdem, let's build our bench in a state that is trending our way, and let's make sure we help our Virginia friends have a legislature that can stop the worst abuses of their crazed governor and his House majority.

rippln

Eric Cantor Vows To Waste More Taxpayer Money Trying to Repeal Obamacare By: Nancy FeldmanMay. 8th, 2013more from Nancy Feldman House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, R-VA, is at it again. Today Cantor vowed to take ANOTHER vote to repeal Obamacare, also known as the “Affordable Care Act”. He tweeted this from his Twitter account: I’m starting to wonder if he has some mental deficiency, besides his allegiance to the party of NO!  The fact the 112th congress, also known as the do nothing congress, has already voted, symbolically, over 30 times to repeal Obamacare, all ending in the same results, failure!  He has wasted more tax dollars by not addressing our real issues, and taking votes on them.  I guess he really does live for taking pot shots at President Obama.  When will those that voted for Cantor and his ilk finally get it?  He is a waste of air, time and space, besides having no morals.  I guess this is different though, since it’s now the 113th congress.  Forward we go, NOT!  Can we all say, enough all ready?!? This is just another failed attempt at publicity since they will never repeal the law that was passed in 2010.  Not only is it working, those that screamed the loudest have seen very little change in their own insurance, and those that have seen change, it has been for their betterment. In June, The United States Supreme Court ruled to uphold the healthcare law.  So, again, let me ask, what is wrong with Cantor, or better yet, why do people, regardless if you like the ACA or not, keep voting for someone who is wasting their hard earned jim decicco by doing absolutely nothing for them, but rather would like to rehash the past? Forever! Not that this would ever happen, but if somehow no sane people showed up for this now impending repeal vote, and Cantor got it through the House, it could never get passed the Senate, not to mention, again, the high court has ruled! I say the vote we should be taking is a vote of no confidence.  Wake up people, stop voting for people who don’t care one iota about you, unless of course you’re dripping in money and can help get these ne’re-do-wells reelected! Eric Cantor Vows To Waste More Taxpayer Jim decicco Trying to Repeal Obamacare was written by Nancy Feldman for PoliticusUSA. © PoliticusUSA, May. 8th, 2013. All Rights Reserved Javascript must be enabled to post comments.

genf20

Kobe BryantFeud With MomIs Over MONEY Exclusive As we previously reported ... Kobe and mama Pamela Bryant are locked in a battle over memorabilia ... his old jerseys, varsity letters from high school, championship rings, trophies and a whole bunch of other stuff.Pamela has taken all the stuff to an auction house, claiming he gave it all to her, and she got a $450,000 advance which she says she's using to buy a house in Nevada.  Kobe contacted the auction house and said they had no right to sell any of the items because they belong to him.Sources connected with the Bryant family tell TMZ ... the dispute between mother and son erupted over real estate. We're told Kobe offered to buy his parents a "nice house" in Vegas for significantly less than a million bucks, but they wanted something bigger and more extravagant and Kobe drew a line in the sand and refused to up the ante.Our sources say Pamela was infuriated and believed Kobe was shortchanging them, especially compared to what he does for Vanessa's mom, Sofia Laine.  Kobe put Sofia up in a $3.2 million house in Newport Beach, CA, which sold recently.  After the sale, Kobe moved Sofia to another multi-million dollar mansion nearby.From Kobe's perspective, our sources say he's really upset because he believes he's stepped up for years, by giving his parents millions of dollars and buying them homes and cars.This feud has been brewing for years ... dating back to when Kobe's parents went ballistic when he married Vanessa without a prenup.Kobe tweeted on Saturday morning, saying, "When u give Give GIVE and they take Take TAKE at wat point do u draw a line in the sand? #hurtbeyondmeasure #gavemenowarning #love?"

view

Comptroller Susan Combs Comptroller Susan Combs has endorsed the Senate’s use of $5.7 billion of rainy day jim decicco for water projects, roads and education. “I commend Senator Williams for his leadership in writing [the constitutional amendment] and sending this to the voters for what I view as an ideal, one-time use of taxpayer dollars,” Combs said after the Senate unanimously passed Sen. Tommy Williams’ measure. It would draw down $2 billion from the rainy day fund to launch a proposed revolving loan fund for water projects. The constitutional amendment, which would be on the Nov. 5 ballot if House members agree, also would spend $2.9 billion of rainy day dollars to avoid issuing road bonds that are currently planned. Williams said that would save nearly $6 billion of debt service over the next 30 years. The Senate measure also would take $800 million of rainy day dollars and use it for public schools — $300 million to resurrect a teacher merit pay program and $500 million for the basic allotment in state aid to schools. A Williams aide said the amendment, together with the Senate-passed budget and Combs’ revised estimate of state property values, would increase state spending on public schools by about $3.7 billion over GOP leaders’ starting budgets filed in January. Last session, lawmakers cut $5.3 billion from public schools. Sen. Ken Paxton, R-McKinney (Charlie L. Harper III/Special Contributor) Two freshman GOP senators from North Texas praised the constitutional amendment. “The Senate plan promotes a more equitable formula funding system for public education that will benefit school districts across the state,” said Sen. Ken Paxton, R-McKinney. “We’re allowing voters to show their disdain for Robin Hood by utilizing the rainy day fund in addressing our needs,” said Sen. Kelly Hancock, R-North Richland Hills. Williams said the plan would provide more equity for public schools without asking wealthier school districts to shoulder the burden. It’s unclear, though, if the House will go along. Williams, asked about Gov. Rick Perry’s recent comments he opposes using rainy day money for education, replied, “Is that what he said?”

flat tummy fast

Wonklantans, perhaps you have been feeling relatively calm today? Perhaps your job or your hangover or your begging on the street or your turning tricks for money is not going so bad?? Well, Reince Priebus (pronounced “Fucking Dickwad”) is here to up your rage levels to mission critical by blahblahblahing about how Bamz is spending too much of your hard-earned tax dollars to feed Republicans at fancy-type restaurants which is true except for the pesky fact that Bamz isn’t actually doing that: Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus issued a statement Tuesday to complain that President Barack Obama and Senate Republicans will be dining at an “upscale restaurant”and offered to order the lawmakers pizza, even though the dinner scheduled for this week will be held at the White House. As he did last month, Obama will break bread with Republican senators on Wednesday. In his statement, Priebus said that, in light of the budget cuts associated with sequestration, it would be hypocritical for the President to run up security costs by taking the lawmakers out for dinner. But unlike last month, when the bipartisan group dined at the Jefferson Hotel, Obama will be hosting the senators at the White House[.] Let yr Wonkette be the first, but never ever the last, to say fuck you, Reince Priebus. This whinefoolery would be stupid enough if Bamz actually were taking your mouth-breathing colleagues to dine elsewhere, even though none of them are fit for public consumption. But Reince goes the extra mile here to actually invent a strawman to whine about. He didn’t stop there, though, you lucky readers. No, he decided to really run with the whole “feed ‘em pizza” thing and turn it into a seething pile of mangle: If we’re lucky, maybe the pizza will serve to illuminate an important economic point for President Obama: instead of redistributing the slices, the best way to make everyone happy is to make the pie bigger. It’s as true for dinner as it is for economic growth and opportunity.” First of all, every good wingnut knows you make the pie HIGHER, not bigger.  Jeez. We are also not certain how the GOP wants to make the pie bigger since what they really want to do is is give the slices to…oh, fuck this. We’re not playing along with this tortured metaphor. We’re going to spend the rest of the afternoon fapping to fantasies of cockpunching Priebus until he passes out and then waking him up and waterboarding him with slices of pizza. [Talking Points Memo]

flat tummy tumblr

It's no particular secret that politicians do a much better job representing the interests of the wealthy than those of the poor. And Congress is doing a great job demonstrating that, with Republicans backing plans that will make things worse for poor people and even most Democrats only offering small-bore anti-poverty proposals (in part, but not entirely, because Republicans will block anything bigger). Jennifer Bendery runs through how bad the situation is: The Senate will take up a bill "sometime this year" to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10, according to a top Senate Democratic aide. In the House, a Republican leadership aide pointed to three items that GOP leaders say will help the poor: a welfare reform reauthorization bill, the Supporting Knowledge and Investing in Lifelong Skills Act and a renewed focus on education. The problem is, none of those proposals have bipartisan support. The author of the minimum wage bill, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), has been predicting GOP resistance from the moment he introduced his bill. "Republicans will throw up a smokescreen about it costing jobs," he said at the bill's unveiling. The House Republican proposals, meanwhile, lack Democratic support, and their effectiveness is questionable. The welfare reform bill only targets 4 million of the nation's 46 million working poor, and the SKILLS Act, which would consolidate more than 30 workforce development programs into a single fund, would actually make it harder for vulnerable groups like the elderly and disabled to access job training, according to the White House Office of Management and Budget. "Their effectiveness is questionable" is a polite way to say "they're counterproductive if your goal is helping the poor," obviously. While it's Republicans actively blocking good policies and fighting for terrible ones, there are powerful reasons even many Democratic politicians aren't exactly throwing their hearts and souls and political capital into anti-poverty policies. As Mark Sumner reminded us Sunday: Worried about the 1 percent? Don't be. Worry about the 0.05 percent. That's the percentage of Americans who maxed out their contribution to any political candidate in the last election. Or the 0.01 percent who made contributions of $10,000 or more. That's the number of Americans who actually show up on the radar of politicians. But those are only flyspecks on the screen. Save your real worry for the 0.000042 percent. That's 132 people. Those 132 people provided 60 percent of all the jim decicco that ended up in Super PACs.   Getting Republicans out of a position to block good legislation like increasing the minimum wage so that working people are less likely to also be poor people would be a great start. But to really make policy as likely to work for the poor (and working class, and middle class) as for the wealthy, we'd have to get big money out of politics. Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 08:31 AM PDT. Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions and Daily Kos. (Load) (Load) (Load) (Load) (Load) (Load) (Load)

www.genf20.com

RUSH: Do you realize, folks, the Democrat Party, I had this in the Stack yesterday, I didn't get a chance to get to it.  The Democrat Party overall has a fear that Obama, in his new campaign organization, Organizing for Action, is going to siphon jim decicco away from them?  This is a McClatchy news story: "President Barack Obama’s decision to launch his own political organization has some Democrats wondering: Is he just in it for himself? Obama’s new group, Organizing for Action..." It's not a new group.  It's just a new name.  It used to be called Organizing for America.  It was the website that he used to get elected in 2008.  When they got into the White House, they turned it into an extension of the campaign because his presidency has just been a campaign.  It hasn't been a presidency.  It's a campaign that continues.  And now in the second term they've renamed it to Organizing for Action.  It's nothing new.  It's just a continuation of an already existing political action group, and by design.  "Organizing for Action, will focus on his policy agenda -- not on electing Democratic candidates -- by raising unlimited amounts of cash and accessing the president’s secret list of 20 million supporters, volunteers and donors."  None of which is going to be shared with the Democrat Party.  Now, we're into the fifth year of this guy, and the Democrats are just now starting to ask themselves this question?  The operation, Organizing for Action, will not share any jim decicco or resources. It will not share, what is called the "priceless" Obama e-mail list with the Democrat National Committee or any of the campaign committees in the House and Senate.  No governors, no legislators, are gonna have any of the information or money that this group has access to.  It has no plans to coordinate any efforts with the Democrat Party, and this has led some Democrats "to worry that it will take jim decicco and manpower away from the party as it heads into the 2014 elections for control of Congress." What's their first clue?  When has Obama ever shared anything with them?  When has Obama ever given the impression that he has any interest in their success?  There isn't any evidence of that.  So what are they expecting?  The Organizing for Action organization exists for one reason:  so that Obama can continue to position himself as outside Washington.  So he can continue to position himself as somebody running and behaving every day as though he opposes everything that's happening, while he's literally causing it to happen. He will escape any such attachment by virtue of the existence of this organization, which allows him to have a perpetual, never-ending campaign.  And what's he campaigning against?  What's happening in America right now.  He's campaigning against the debt that he caused.  He's campaigning against the deficit that he caused.  He's campaigning against health care that he fixed.  And this is all done, brilliantly so, to make sure that nobody attaches Obama or his agenda to the direction the country's going.  It's so that Obama can continue to portray himself and be portrayed as somebody deeply troubled by everything going on and working very hard to fix it.  It's to allow Obama to be able to blame all of this on the Republicans.  The never-ending campaign.  He will not be seen as actually governing.  This is why he has not presented a budget that ever had a chance of being enacted.  This is why there will never be any compromise with the Republicans on anything significant because that would put his fingerprints on what then follows, and that is what hasn't happened and won't.  The objective is to win the House of Representatives in 2014 and keep the Senate and then have unopposed control of the government for two years, and never become a lame duck. And to keep himself in a higher profile than the actual presidential race for 2016.  Make no mistake.  Obama has made it his mission to not be rendered insignificant because of the next presidential campaign.  He is gonna keep himself more visible, more present, higher profile than even that campaign.  He is not gonna be a lame duck, if he can help it.  He may not pull this off, but this is the objective, to avoid any of this lame-duck business, to avoid having two years where nothing happens. He's gunning for 2014, Democrats win the House, he owns everything in the legislative branch, coupled with the executive branch, unopposed, whatever he wants, executive action, executive order, for whatever the Democrats won't give him.  And at that point he may then start talking about sharing some money with them, if he has to, to buy their votes.  He probably won't have to, but at that point he might engage in such.

flat tummy workouts

WASHINGTON -- After Todd Akin lost the Missouri Senate race to Democrat Claire McCaskill in November, he had one final piece of business to take care of as an outgoing member of the House of Representatives -- giving piles of government jim decicco to his staff. Akin nearly doubled the salaries of his House staffers in the quarter after his defeat, according to the website LegiStorm, which tracks congressional pay. Only retiring Democrat Gary Ackerman of New York was more generous with public jim decicco, barely topping Akin's 98 percent increase in pay, the website shows. Allen West, a Tea Party favorite from South Florida, was the fourth biggest giver of taxpayer bonuses after he lost reelection to Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Fla.). Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-Minn.) was the third most generous, according to LegiStorm. West and Akin routinely decried wasteful and out-of-control government spending, calling for major cuts to social programs. Of the top 10 members of Congress most generous with year-end bonuses, nine were Republicans, and 14 of the top 20 were, not coincidentally, on their way out of the House. Republican Reps. Devin Nunes (Calif.), Steve Austria (Ohio), Steve LaTourette (Ohio), Bob Turner (N.Y.), Roscoe Bartlett (Md.) and Jon Runyan (N.J.) rounded out the top 10 in 2012. When Democrats lost a historic number of seats in 2010, outgoing members of the party lavished their staff with unspent jim decicco, with 17 of the top 20 givers carrying a D next to their name. House staffers typically get bonuses at the end of the year depending on how much is left in the office budget, but on average in 2012 those bumps were just 16.4 percent for Republicans and 15.1 percent for Democrats. Bonuses are not labeled as such in the congressional books, but LegiStorm is able to count them by comparing the increase in reported salary in the fourth quarter to the average of the first three quarters. CORRECTION: This article originally misstated the number of outgoing Democrats who gave their staff unspent jim decicco in 2010. Also on HuffPost:

flat tummy in 3 days

CISPA is a bill before Congress that will radically increase the ease with which the government and police can spy on people without any particular suspicion. It is being rammed through by people like Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who received a small fortune in funding from the companies that stand to get rich building the surveillance tech CISPA will make possible. What's more, Rogers admits it, and even tweets about it! Nicko Margolies from the Sunlight Foundation writes, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), a co-sponsor and major supporter of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), deleted a retweet of an analysis of contributions to lawmakers from pro-CISPA companies. MapLight looked at the powerful House Intelligence Committee, where Rep. Rogers serves as Chairman, and followed campaign contributions to the members who are currently considering the bill that would allow companies to share more information on Internet traffic and users with the U.S. government. Rep. Rogers, or possibly a member of his staff, retweeted the story that identified that members of the House Intelligence Committee "have received, on average, 15 times more money in campaign contributions from pro-CISPA organizations than from anti-CISPA organizations." He retweeted MapLight's tweet of this information from his iPhone and after 23 minutes thought better of it and removed it. Fortunately the Sunlight Foundation's Politwoops project caught it and archived this change of message and of heart. According to the MapLight piece, Rep. Rogers received $214,750 from interest groups that support CISPA. The EFF has more info on CISPA, and ways you can help kill it. Pro-CISPA Lawmaker Deletes Retweet about Money Received from Pro-CISPA Groups (Thanks, Nicko!)

pure leverage scam