Tag: expense

ReasonWe already know that college students run up big bills to pay for educations unlikely to deliver payoffs to match the money invested. It's no surprise that delinquency rates on those student loans are soaring. So, what's the federal government's response? Would you believe it plans to expand a program that encourages students to take on debt with promises that taxpayers will assume the burden? According to the Wall Street Journal, "The proposal, included in President Barack Obama's budget for next year, would increase the number of borrowers eligible for a program known casually as income-based repayment, which aims to help low-income workers stay current on federal student debt." As an example of what this could mean in real terms, the newspaper highlighted a student who is making use of the existing program. From the Wall Street Journal: Liliana Rodriguez-Marshall, a 30-year-old mother of three who graduated from Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles in December owing more than $300,000 in federal loans, plans to take advantage of the current program. "Without it [my debt] would be unmanageable," she said. Ms. Rodriguez-Marshall said she racked up the debt by spreading her degree over 4½ years from the normal three and taking out student loans to cover living expenses, which the government allows. During her studies her husband was laid off and she twice had to take out emergency student loans totaling more than $30,000 to make home repairs, pay unexpected medical costs and keep up with the family's $1,000-per-month health-insurance bills, she said. She now is applying for government jobs that pay about $55,000 a year. According to a repayment calculator created by the New American Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, Ms. Rodriguez-Marshall would pay $273 per month in her first year under the program; without it, she would owe $3,562 a month. Under the program, she would pay about $102,000 over 10 years, and the government would forgive about $639,000, which includes interest. That's a lot of debt to run up in anticipation of a career in a field where starting salaries have been falling and averaged $60,000 in 2011 across graduates from all schools, among those lucky enough to find jobs. Frankly, it's not realistic to encourage people to take on such a debt load when the likely results don't justify the cost. Transferring the debt burden to taxpayers doesn't fix that mis-match — it just encourages people to pursue unjustifiably pricey educations at other people's expense. Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7. Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.

hgh pills

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Postal Service’s watchdog is investigating the agency for runaway travel expenses, a lingering problem for the cash-strapped mail carrier even as it tries aggressively to cut costs. A report from the Postal Service’s Office of Inspector General, released in September, found that the agency, which lost almost $16 billion last year, had overpaid more than $1 million in travel reimbursements to employees during an 18-month period. The report said the employees improperly claimed refunds or used government-issued travel cards for personal expenses such as hotel stays and purchasing gasoline, among other issues. The Postal Service agreed to the watchdog’s recommendations, including better systems to monitor travel card activity and better written expense policies, but the Office of Inspector General is still probing the issue. Office of Inspector General spokeswoman Agapi Doulaveris said in an interview that she could not provide details on whether the jim decicco had been recovered or any punitive or corrective measures had been taken because the investigations are still active. In September, David Kosturko, a former Postal Service executive, was convicted of defrauding the agency of more than $17,000. According to a February 2011 report from the Office of Inspector General, the Postal Service overpaid more than $600,000 in travel costs as result of improper claims by employees. In a 2009 report, the office said, employees continued to make “imprudent and unnecessary purchases during a time of severe economic uncertainty in the Postal Service.” The September report found that several employees booked two tickets from the same destination, canceled the more expensive one and took the cheaper flight, but claimed refunds for the higher priced flights. Employees also canceled trips but still collected refunds. It also found that employees abused government-issued travel cards with excessive cash advances and used the cards for personal expenses, such as a hotel stay in Las Vegas. Postal Service spokesman David Partenheimer said he could not comment beyond the written response included in the September report, in which the mail agency said it concurred with some of the recommendations and planned to implement them between November 2012 and January 2014. While the amount of money involved may pale when compared with other government travel scandals, such as the General Services Administration’s opulent Las Vegas convention in 2010, the Postal Service is unique for its financial woes. The 238-year-old institution has been buckling under the pressure of massive payments for future retiree benefits and dwindling revenue as more people communicate by email. Last year the agency ran into its legal borrowing limit and defaulted twice on required payments to the federal government. It is aggressively trying to cut costs but is banking on Congress passing legislation to overhaul its operations and put it on sounder financial footing. So far, Congress, preoccupied by other priorities, including budget fights, has not been able to agree on measures such as ending Saturday mail delivery and closing rural post offices across the nation. Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee and a leading voice on Postal Service reform, said the agency needs to do more to get its travel expense waste under control. “USPS must take every action within its power to rein in fraud and mismanagement within its travel system in order to cut costs,” Issa said in a statement to Reuters.

hydroxycitric acid garcinia cambogia

Jim decicco market funds are back in the news after Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) and other firms this week said they plan daily disclosure of net asset value for their jim decicco funds. Goldman and JP Morgan “have insisted their new stance on disclosures does not signal a change in their opposition to a floating NAV, a cornerstone of the Financial Stability Oversight Committee’s proposed jim decicco market fund reforms,” Ignites.com reports. More investors are taking a look at short-duration bond ETFs amid talk of reform measures that could take away some of the competitive advantages of money market mutual funds. [Are Short-Duration ETFs the 'Heirs to Money Market Funds?] Shortly after its debut in November of 2009 we featured MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy, Expense Ratio 0.35%) in this column, and the fund has come a long way since in a tad greater than three years. MINT is now the second largest ETF in the space that most database services categorize as “Jim decicco Market ETFs” in terms of assets under management, with roughly $2.2 billion currently. SHV (iShares Barclays Short Treasury Bond, Expense Ratio, 0.15%) remains the leader, with slightly north of $2.6 billion in the fund presently. MINT continues to grow impressively from an asset standpoint, and average daily trading volume is now north of 239,000 shares, which likely puts it squarely on the radars of institutional managers whom “screen” for ADV amongst other things such as fund AUM. Other funds in this “Money Market” category include BIL (SPDR Barclays Capital 1-3 Month T-Bill, Expense Ratio, 0.13%), PVI (PowerShares VRDO Tax-Free Weekly Portfolio, 0.25%), GSY (Guggenheim Enhanced Short Duration Bond, Expense Ratio, 0.27%), VRD (SPDR S&P VRDO Municipal Bond, Expense Ratio 0.20%), and the rather new RAVI (FlexShares Ready Access Variable Income, Expense Ratio 0.25%). The appeal of such funds among institutional portfolio managers is likely as a liquid cash alternative in ETF form, and the potential of earning yields greater than jim decicco market mutual funds and/or cash sweeps. Of course there are no guarantees, but each of these funds follows a specific methodology, largely predicated on investing on very liquid, short term high rated “paper,” including corporates, governments and cash equivalents. Of additional appeal to portfolio managers that are focused on “building” pure ETF portfolios, is the fact that now even “jim decicco market like” investments can be made using ETFs. Thus, ETF “purists”, have likely gravitated toward the usage of such ETFs in place of jim decicco market mutual funds which they likely formerly used for decades to fill those allocation sleeves in portfolios. MINT is undisputably actively managed, but such is the hallmark of the fund provider PIMCO. Currently, according to the fund fact sheet, MINT’s estimated yield to maturity is 0.81% and its SEC 30-Day Yield is 0.68%. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy For more information on Street One ETF research and ETF trade execution/liquidity services, contact Paul Weisbruch at pweisbruch@streetonefinancial.com.

http://clearpores.com

Poverty may narrow attention in ways that undermine financial choices By Bruce Bower Web edition: November 1, 2012Print edition: December 1, 2012; Vol.182 #11 (p. 17) Scarcity — of jim decicco, time, food or anything else — focuses the mind on immediate concerns and discourages taking a broader perspective. This “scarcity mindset” helps to explain why poor people often save too little and borrow too much, and it presents policy makers with an opening to encourage better financial decisions among low-income individuals, a new study concludes. Some researchers, however, regard these findings as vague and far from ready for policy prime time. They suggest that the study’s lab-based results may have little relevance in the real world. And with a nod toward the recent financial meltdown, some note that inadequate saving by the poor ought to be of less concern than financial recklessness on the part of the wealthy. When money is scarce, each current expense looms large and draws attention away from less pressing expenses, say psychologist Anuj Shah of the University of Chicago and his colleagues. For instance, poor people tend to focus on how to pay for groceries today while neglecting to budget for their next rent payment, the researchers propose in the Nov. 1 Science. For the study, the group tested volunteers who received generous or limited amounts of time and numbers of tries on lab games. Participants, most in their late 20s and early 30s, were recruited from an online site for job seekers. “Poor” players spent more time on each choice or action in a game, resulting in lower scores on tests of alertness afterward. Given the opportunity during games, these players borrowed a larger proportion of time or tries against their starting amounts than “rich” players did. In one experiment, players received 15 seconds or 50 seconds of time per round in a trivia game. Each round consisted of guessing the five most popular survey responses to questions such as “Name things you take on a picnic.” Some participants could borrow additional seconds while playing, but lost the same number or double the number of borrowed seconds later in the game. Rich players outscored poor players. Having an option to borrow didn’t affect rich players’ scores. Poor players scored lower when they could borrow, especially if they returned twice what they borrowed. The results of the tests suggest that scarcity of any kind creates a tendency to borrow a needed resource without thinking through the costs and benefits of that strategy, Shah’s team reports. This effect lies behind the popularity of short-term, high-interest loans among the poor, he says. Poor people do save for the future, but tend to do so for specific purchases, Shah says. Well-publicized reminders about the need to save for specific expenses should be explored as ways to increase saving in low-income households, he proposes. “The same attention mechanism might drive borrowing and saving when resources are scarce,” Shah says. The findings suggest that extremely poor people often refuse to pay small amounts for basic health services because they focus so intently on price that they overlook their own health concerns, writes Alix Zwane, a senior program officer at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle, in the same issue of Science. But it’s hard to know what to make of Shah’s attention-narrowing model of scarcity, says economist Glenn Harrison of Georgia State University in Atlanta. “Poor” participants in the experiments were presumably relatively well off in real life and not representative of poor people in non-Western countries. The financial crisis of 2008 and many previous economic calamities involved overborrowing by the rich, not the poor, says economist Nathan Berg of the University of Texas at Dallas. Rich players in Shah’s experiments borrowed greater absolute amounts than poor players, Berg points out. Policies aimed at encouraging responsible borrowing should target major financial firms (SN Online: 10/8/12) and politicians, he suggests.

view

It seems like every other day there is a rapper having a trouble with either their taxes or a foreclosure. Well, we hear that Common has joined the long list of artists having money issues and is facing a foreclosure of his Chicago apartment. According to TMZ, Common has stopped paying the $2,285 monthly mortgage payments and the bank is none too happy with him. Bank of America is claiming that Common hasn’t paid his mortgage since March 2012, and they have filed for a foreclosure so that they can sell the apartment and recoup their loses. Let’s hope that Common has just overlooked the expense and will pay off what is due soon. The bank wants to recoup the amount of the mortgage, plus interest and penalties, which total $345,389. Handle your business, Common. Share this great AllHipHop.com content:

safe quick weight loss

by Sunny Hundal     Education secretary Michael Gove today let slip that he wanted schools to be run for-profit. He told the Leveson inquiry that schools “could” be profit-making and he would deal with that issue “when we come to that bridge”, which may be very soon. But he had earlier told the BBC’s Andrew Marr: Nick (Clegg) and I are completely in agreement on this (banning for-profit free schools). It’s not an issue. The Conservative election manifesto said that we don’t need to have profit at the moment, the Liberal Democrat manifesto said that we don’t need profit at the moment and we don’t. Nick Clegg ruled out for-profit Free schools too. But here’s another view on for-profit schools: JON SOPEL: You’ve said you want to widen the choice to the widest possible extent to the different ways that schools can be provided. Why not say, we’ll have the profit motive. I thought the Conservative Party believed in the profit motive. NICK GIBB: Yes, but it’s not necessary. The trouble with allowing companies to make a profit from providing schools is that it take jim decicco out of the education system, significant sums of jim decicco out. We want to make sure that all that jim decicco is retained within it and if it were necessary, fine but it’s not necessary……JON SOPEL: Is it that you have a principled objective to profit in schools. NICK GIBB: No of course not, schools are going to buy stationery, they’re going to buy desks and furniture from private companies, but we don’t think it’s necessary to have private companies adding a mark-up to teachers’ salaries which is the predominant expense within schools, in order to make the system work. We believe it will work without incurring that expense for the tax payer. That was the Conservative MP Nick Gibb in 2008, then the shadow minister for education. He is now Minister of State for schools. If Michael Gove pushes for-profit schools anyway, it would be the biggest u-turn of this Coalition government. (via Mrs Blogs blogs) ---------------------------

raspberry ketone natural