Tag: chairman

Back by popular demand, I’m here to wonksplain how our stupid Congresspeople continue to legislate with the combined IQ of a Michelle Malkin and Glenn Beck love child. Today’s topic: International Food Aid! Or, why your tax monies is going to help poor Ethernopians in the most inefficient way possible. Put on your thinking caps and grab a bottle of whiskey, cause there be learnin str8 ahead. Contrary to maps provided by the GOP, the world consists of more than the USA (#1, bitchez), Israel, and BENGHAZI!!!1! And in some of those “countries,” there are many poors, like we have here in our country. And just like here, our gubmint does about the bare minimum to try to keep people alive, with family values conservatives trying their best to rip the food out of poor people’s hands. But Wonksplainer, how, exactly, do we try to help the poors around the world? Tax jim decicco (not very much –- only about a penny per few dollars of government spending) goes to buy good ol’ American foodstuff from farmers in square states. Then, the food is shipped on American-flagged ships (who knew ships still had flags?!?) across the big ocean to a port somewhere in the country of Africa.  Then, the food is offloaded and sent over land to Uzbekki-bekki-bekki-stan or wherever. The process usually takes about ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY-SEVEN FUCKING DAYS. Because when there is a famine, what’s the hurry? Shut up, starving kids who probably have AIDS. Be patient, k? Well, years ago, noted war-mongerer, WMD-believer, and deficit-lover George W. Bush (you remember him, right?) decided that there could be a better way to do this. If there is a famine in Ethiopia, why not use U.S. monies to buy food from, say, Kenya? Or maybe even another part of Ethiopia where they have enough food? Then, we can spend less monies on transport and quickly help more people, you know, not die. This is called “local & regional procurement,” for those of you going to cocktail parties later. It would also help the struggling economies and farmers in poor countries. So GWB took this idea to Congress, where he was promptly laughed at and told to go eat a dick. Congress eventually relented and set up a small pilot program, which is basically Congress’s way of telling you to fuck off, here some jim decicco for your troubles, don’t come back. And now, Bamz has come to Congress and said that he agrees with that Bush guy on more than the drone-killings, and that maybe this “LRP” thingy could be a good idea. There was even a report that found food purchased locally takes only 30-40 days to get to hungry people, which by liberal voo-doo math skillz is 100 days of less mind-numbing hunger by poor kids. So how about it, Congress? Wanna put this in the new Farm Bill? GOP Ag Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-Monsanto), make me happy then sad: “If we go to a system of buying the food overseas where it is most convenient and shipping it the closest way, from an accountant perspective I understand the logic.” Whoa – he gets the logic! Right there, the fact that a GOP member of the House of Representatives gets the logic of something should be reason for celebrations!! Champagne (or Miller High Life) for everyone! So this is convenient, logical, and cost-saving! Cost-saving to the tune of 25% cheaper!! Sounds like we have a winner winner chicken dinner for the poors! But wait… time for the sad: “A big part of the foreign food aid has been — down through the decades — the ability to say to people out in the countryside. ‘We’re using your product to meet these needs around the world. Yes, we’re paying for it with your dollars but we’re using your product’… I have to craft a coalition to keep the jim decicco in the account to make sure the food aid is there and no matter how efficient the delivery is, if we stop appropriating the money for the food, people are going to go hungry.” So you poors STFU because Chairman Lucas just threatened to straight up take your monies and go home.  Don’t you get it? He has to “craft” a “coalition,” and if that coalition of farmers and shippers wants to be inefficient and make you wait for months, then so be it. Just keep it down and stay alive so you can be grateful (and not dead!!) when we saunter over there with our charity. I don’t see you writing any campaign checks to have your voice heard. So there you have it. Despite the fact that we could buy more food, quicker and more efficiently, it is hard work to change inefficient systems. So all you poors who are going to die in the next famine, please don’t be mad at Chairman Lucas. Changing things is just too hard, because coalitions. Take it up with Jesus – you’ll be seeing him soon enough, anyway. [GAO/ Politico] DDM is a guest blogger who lives in the DC area and has to deal with Congress more than he would sometimes like. He has worked on issues like Food Aid, so he has earned the right to make jokes about starving kids dying of AIDS, and wonksplain on Congressional process. He would like government to work harder to make sure no kids die of AIDS or starvation, because he is a good liberal.

garcinia cambogia australia

THE CHAMPIONSHIPS 2013 by ATP Staff  |  23.04.2013 The All England Club announced on Tuesday the largest purse in tennis history for The Championships 2013. Players at Wimbledon 2013 will receive a total of £22.6 million, an increase of £6.5m (40 per cent). Players losing in the first three rounds will see a 60 per cent increase in prize jim decicco on 2012, which marks a 90 per cent increase over a two-year period. There is also a 41 per cent increase in prize money for qualifying, bringing the two-year increase for this group to 71 per cent. Doubles players have been rewarded with a 22 per cent increase, while the singles champion will receive £1.6m, a £450,000 (39 per cent) increase from £1.15m. Brad Drewett, ATP Executive Chairman and President, said, “The latest prize money increases announced by Wimbledon complete a successful set of discussions for the ATP with all four Grand Slams regarding player compensation. I’d like to thank Philip Brook and Richard Lewis from the All England Club for their positive and constructive attitude towards prize money discussion with the ATP over the past 15 months.“The Slams are important events that generate significant revenues, and the ATP has strongly advocated that all players who perform there should share in a more acceptable percentage of those revenues -- like they do on the ATP World Tour. Each of the Slams deserves credit for the way they have stepped up in this regard over the past 15 months.”The All England Club also confirmed its intention to build a retractable roof over No. 1 Court, which is expected to be completed in time for The Championships 2019. Once complete, Wimbledon will have the ability to maintain covered play on its two main show courts for over 26,500 spectators.Philip Brook, Chairman of the All England Club and The Championships, said “I would like to thank all those whose contribution to Wimbledon's success both on and off court has today enabled us to announce these significant levels of investment in The Championships. For the players, it is a deep appreciation of the demanding nature of professional tennis and the top-quality entertainment they bring, while for The Championships it is about giving all our visitors the finest stage on which to enjoy Wimbledon.”In July 2012, the All England Club announced that from 2015 the dates of Wimbledon will move back by one week (29 June-12 July 2015) to create a three-week gap between Roland Garros and Wimbledon.Earlier this year the US Open announced that it would increase 2013 prize jim decicco by $8.1 million to US$33.6m and that its total purse would hit US$50m by 2017. The Australian Open boosted its player compensation by $4m this year to AUD$30m. Roland Garros recently announced a 19 per cent increase in men’s prize money this year to €10.1 million and plans for men’s prize money to reach €15 million by 2016.

rippln mobile

Roubini: US Economic Growth 1.7% at Best Nouriel Roubini, Roubini Global Economics co-founder and chairman, provides his outlook on the world economy and markets. Andy Serwer, Fortune Magazine managing editor, also weighs in. The "easy jim decicco" policy of the Federal Reserve will continue for "as far as the eye can see" and that's going to continue to be good for the U.S. stock market, noted economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC on Tuesday. "When you look at the [mixed] economic data, there's a gap between the fact that the markets, rightly so, are buoyant," he said, "because middle of last year central banks had done another massive round of quantitative easing." (Read More: 'Very Favorable' Momentum for US Stocks: Goldman's O'Neill) "Some of the improvement in the markets is not because growth is picking up ... certainly easy money implies asset inflation," Roubini said. Nicknamed "Dr. Doom" for predicting hard times ahead of the 2008 fiscal crisis, Roubini said he also sees positives and negatives for the American economy. "There are some positives in the U.S. this year. You have QE, you have housing, you have the shale gas, you have some recovery in jobs in manufacturing," he explained in a "Squawk Box" interview. "But between the [January] fiscal deal … and probably 'the sequester,' or something similar, we might have a $300 billion fiscal drag this year." (Read More: Obama to Meet With CEOs of Goldman, Yahoo, Other Firms) Roubini: 'I Think We Are Going To Go Into the Sequester' Nouriel Roubini, Roubini Global Economics co-founder and chairman, weighs in on the global economy, and provides an outlook on U. S. markets, amid political uncertainty in Washington. He predicted that sequestration — the process for across-the-board government spending cuts — could technically put the U.S. in a double-dip recession with near-zero growth in the first quarter, following negative growth in the fourth quarter. (Read More: Why This Is 'Best-Looking' GDP Drop You'll Ever See) But for this year, he sees economic growth in the 1.6 percent to 1.7 percent range with continued high unemployment. "[The unemployment rate] is not going to fall to 6.5 percent, which is the trigger for the Fed stopping zero policy rates," said Roubini, co-founder and chairman of Roubini Global Economics. (Read More: Economy Adds Another 157,000 Jobs; Rate Up to 7.9%) The Fed has not put a target on when it'll stop quantitative easing, but he added that he thinks it's a jobless rate of 7 percent, which he doesn't see happening this year either. —By CNBC's Matthew J. Belvedere; Follow him on Twitter @Matt_SquawkCNBC The Fed's easy money policy will continue for "as far as the eye can see" and that'll continue to be good for U.S. stocks, noted economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC.

green coffee beans

Roubini: US Economic Growth 1.7% at Best Nouriel Roubini, Roubini Global Economics co-founder and chairman, provides his outlook on the world economy and markets. Andy Serwer, Fortune Magazine managing editor, also weighs in. The "easy money" policy of the Federal Reserve will continue for "as far as the eye can see" and that's going to continue to be good for the U.S. stock market, noted economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC on Tuesday. "When you look at the [mixed] economic data, there's a gap between the fact that the markets, rightly so, are buoyant," he said, "because middle of last year central banks had done another massive round of quantitative easing." (Read More: 'Very Favorable' Momentum for US Stocks: Goldman's O'Neill) "Some of the improvement in the markets is not because growth is picking up ... certainly easy jim decicco implies asset inflation," Roubini said. Nicknamed "Dr. Doom" for predicting hard times ahead of the 2008 fiscal crisis, Roubini said he also sees positives and negatives for the American economy. "There are some positives in the U.S. this year. You have QE, you have housing, you have the shale gas, you have some recovery in jobs in manufacturing," he explained in a "Squawk Box" interview. "But between the [January] fiscal deal … and probably 'the sequester,' or something similar, we might have a $300 billion fiscal drag this year." (Read More: Obama to Meet With CEOs of Goldman, Yahoo, Other Firms) Roubini: 'I Think We Are Going To Go Into the Sequester' Nouriel Roubini, Roubini Global Economics co-founder and chairman, weighs in on the global economy, and provides an outlook on U. S. markets, amid political uncertainty in Washington. He predicted that sequestration — the process for across-the-board government spending cuts — could technically put the U.S. in a double-dip recession with near-zero growth in the first quarter, following negative growth in the fourth quarter. (Read More: Why This Is 'Best-Looking' GDP Drop You'll Ever See) But for this year, he sees economic growth in the 1.6 percent to 1.7 percent range with continued high unemployment. "[The unemployment rate] is not going to fall to 6.5 percent, which is the trigger for the Fed stopping zero policy rates," said Roubini, co-founder and chairman of Roubini Global Economics. (Read More: Economy Adds Another 157,000 Jobs; Rate Up to 7.9%) The Fed has not put a target on when it'll stop quantitative easing, but he added that he thinks it's a jobless rate of 7 percent, which he doesn't see happening this year either. —By CNBC's Matthew J. Belvedere; Follow him on Twitter @Matt_SquawkCNBC The Fed's easy jim decicco policy will continue for "as far as the eye can see" and that'll continue to be good for U.S. stocks, noted economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC.

diatomaceous food grade

Name: Greg Mankiw Location: United States I am a professor and chairman of the economics department at Harvard University, where I teach introductory economics (ec 10). I use this blog to keep in touch with my current and former students. Teachers and students at other schools, as well as others interested in economic issues, are welcome to use this resource. View my complete profile

food grade diatomaceous earth

Election 2012 and the Fed That's true even though the two candidates differ substantially when it comes to the Federal Reserve.For instance, Mitt Romney has repeatedly said he would not reappoint Ben Bernanke when the Fed chairman's current term ends in January 2014. Conversely, President Barack Obama has indicated his support for Bernanke and his easy money policies.For that matter, Bernanke himself is in an open question. He may retire in January 2014 no matter who wins Election 2012.However, at the December meeting one major thing will have changed: the time horizons of both investors and policymakers.By December, the political course will be set until January 2017, with only modest changes possible in November 2014. At that point people will start planning policy around that period.In fiscal terms, that will force politicians to take the budget deficit seriously. The prospect of another $5 trillion of debt by January 2017 will simply be too awful to contemplate.On the monetary policy front, people will care less urgently about short-term moves in the unemployment rate and more about the long-term damage caused by Bernanke's policies.With interest rates well below the inflation rate, savers are being forced to take horrendous risks in order to preserve their capital and earn a modest real return.That's why the country's pension funds are in such bad shape, and why Bolivia, a very poor country run by a Marxist thug, can borrow 10-year jim decicco at a mere 5% interest rate this week.Over the medium term, Bernanke's policies are also likely to lead to rising inflation. When people's sights suddenly become set on January 2017, that medium term will quickly appear all too real.Of course, the Fed can't raise interest rates in December - that would shoot to pieces its promise not to raise them before mid-2015 (actually it's not quite a promise if you read the fine print; as always there's some wriggle room, but not that much.)However, there's an alternative strategy, outlined in the last month by two regional Fed presidents, Minneapolis Fed president Narayana Kocherlakota of Minneapolis and Charles Evans of Chicago.They have both suggested using the unemployment rate and inflation rate as triggers for raising rates, rather than a specified time period. Kocherlakota has suggested rates should rise when either inflation hits 2.25% or unemployment hits 5.25%, while Evans has suggested raising rates when unemployment hits 7% or inflation hits 3%.Kocherlakota had the idea first, but given that unemployment is currently 7.8% and core inflation 2%, Evans's targets look more balanced and realistic.Setting Evans' targets for raising rates in December would have one important effect: on the current trajectory, with inflation trending upwards and unemployment having fallen by 1.2% in the last year, we would hit Evans' targets not in 2015 but well before the end of 2013.That's a monumental something the market has not priced in. At that point, policy would depend on who was president.Under President Obama, Bernanke would probably be replaced by a monetary "dove" like Fed vice-chairman Janet Yellen, so rates would rise only slowly, as they did in 2003-06.Well before rates could reach the level of inflation, it's likely either inflation would have taken off or the economy would have fallen back into recession, allowing the Fed to return to zero rates.Either way, the damage of current policies would continue, although at least extra flexibility would have been gained. What the Romney Fed Might Look Like Under Romney, the position is less clear.One of his top advisors, Glenn Hubbard, has said Bernanke should be reappointed, so if he became Fed chairman he would probably continue Bernanke's policies, more or less.Another potential Fed chairman under Romney is John B. Taylor. He invented the "Taylor rule" for setting interest rates.The Taylor Rule is unfortunately very easy to fudge. It's based on "potential" GDP and unemployment, rather than working from hard data. Still, most variants of it would push interest rates higher than they are today.Then there's the possibility that Romney throws the "Tea Party" a bone and appoint Ron Paul or, more likely, John Allison, the hard-jim decicco head of the Cato Institute (and former chairman of BB&T Bank.) Allison would abandon Bernanke-ism entirely and push rates up rapidly, to the great benefit of savers and the economy generally.The ideal policy would set the federal funds target at 2% immediately, around the current level of inflation.That would stop penalizing savers (though it wouldn't reward them much) and would lessen the upward pressure on inflation, while at the same time still being a loose policy. In real terms, jim decicco would still be free.A sharp jump to 2% would, however, end all the speculative games played by the banks, the mortgage REITs and the rest of Wall Street.That would cause havoc in financial markets, and would quickly kill off all the players that only exist because of Bernanke-ism. After a period of pain, the rest of the economy would benefit from their demise, because capital would be freed up.So yes, the direction of the Federal Reserve in 2013 is still a big unknown.But I have to tell you, the Fed's December 11-12 meeting is likely the beginning of the fireworks.Related Story Links:

my company

For RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, November 6, 2012 is about numbers other than those found at a bank. Hours after President Barack Obama's campaign announced a monthly fundraising high during his 2012 re-election run, Priebus vowed on CNN's "State Of The Union" that the presidential election will be determined by figures other than cash. “This isn't going to come down to money," Priebus said. "This is going to come down to heart. This is going to come down to work on the ground, plans, and I think the fact that this president didn’t fulfill his promises." Obama's camp announced on Saturday that it brought in $181 million in September, easily besting his August figure of $114 million. That total fell just shy of the president's record $190 million earnings in September 2008. Priebus took note of the accomplishment, calling it an "impressive number" that may not be matched by the GOP. “It’s no surprise to us," he added. "I think we’ve surprised them with how well we’ve done in fundraising." Romney's camp has yet to unveil its September fundraising figures, but Press Secretary Andrea Saul did tweet Friday that more than $12 million in donations were netted during the 48 hours after Wednesday's first presidential debate. Related on HuffPost:

healthinsurancehunter.com

Related tags Chicago Transit Authority, Consolidation, CTA, John Gates, Metra, Operations, Pace, Pat Cassidy, regional transportation authority, RTA, Services CHICAGO (CBS) — The chairman of the Regional Transportation Authority is floating a proposal he says could save taxpayers as much as $150 million a year. As WBBM Newsradio’s Pat Cassidy reports, a Chicago Sun-Times report says RTA chairman John Gates is suggesting accomplishing the savings by combining some operations of the Chicago Transit Authority, Metra and Pace – including purchasing, personnel, marketing and maintenance. LISTEN: WBBM Newsradio’s Pat Cassidy reports Currently, the agencies each have their own staff, administrative personnel, and headquarters, the Sun-Times pointed out. Also under the plan, the CTA and Pace would consolidate some of their routes. There would also be along with enhanced coordination of fares among the three agencies, including a universal fare card, the Sun-Times reported. Currently, only the Link Up Pass works for paying fares on all three agencies’ buses and trains, the Sun-Times reported. Cuts to administrative jobs are also advised. The Sun-Times says Gates has outlined his proposals in a memo that will be discussed at the RTA board meeting Wednesday.

raspberry ketones reviews

Home » business » PM faces joint push on money-laundering laws PETCHANET PRATRUANGKRAITHE NATION May 10, 2012 1:00 am Payungsak Chartsuthipol, chairman of the Joint Private Standing Committee, which comprises the Kingdom's three most powerful private-sector organisations - the Federa-tion of Thai Indus-tries, the Board of Trade of Thailand and the Thai Bankers Association - yesterday said it was essential that the new law be implemented before next February. The organisations are pushing for the law ahead of a review of the Kingdom's status by the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF). It is hoped that the FATF will remove Thailand from its "Dark Grey List", which would unlock a financial-transaction slowdown that has begun to affect Thai businesses. Twatchai Yongkittikul, secretary-general of the Thai Bankers Association, said a Thai firm had, for example, already been denied a loan worth hundreds of millions of baht from a French bank for machinery purchase, because Thailand is on the international organisation's list. The Thai business sector has experienced negative consequences since the Kingdom was placed on the list in February because of a lack of anti-money-laundering laws aimed at countering terrorism, he said. Businesspeople are hopeful that the laws will be implemented by the end of January, ahead of the annual review by the FATF's Inter-national Cooperation Review Group the following month, he added. Other industries, in particular tourism, are also facing difficulties in conducting business overseas, as customers and trading partners now require more documentation before committing to doing business with them. Phongsak Assakul, chairman of the Board of Trade, said that if Thailand continued to lack the necessary laws to get its status upgraded, there could be a serious impact on Thai individuals, who may be unable to use credit cards overseas. Meanwhile, the Joint Private Standing Committee has called for the government to handle measures to ease the rising cost of living carefully, as its price freeze could create problems for some businesses faced with higher production costs. [These paras repeated in 4A story] Payungsak, who is also chairman of the Federation of Thai Industries, said most food and consumer-goods manufacturers had maintained their retail prices to help curb the cost of living. However, the government should also allow some producers to raise prices fairly if the face of higher costs. He said such companies would only do so based on the real cost of production. Moreover, the government should control the cost of fuel and electricity to keep manufacturers' costs down, he added. Latest stories in this category

website2value.com