Tag: business

personal-finance Chris Morris, Special to CNBC.com May 17, 2013 at 11:52 AM ET Getty Images Adult film actress Chanel Preston Chanel Preston knows not everyone approves of her chosen profession. That's one of the risks that go with being one of the biggest stars in porn. But she never thought it would affect her ability to open a james decicco account. Preston recently opened a business account with City National Bank in Los Angeles. When she went to deposit checks into the account days later, however, she was told it had been shut down, due to "compliance issues". She found the manager she had originally worked with and asked what had happened. The bank, she was told, was worried about the Webcam shows she had on her site and had revoked the account. (City National declined to comment on Preston's accusations and on whether it had any policy regarding accounts tied to the porn industry.) Preston is hardly the only porn star who has had trouble with the banking industry. Several performers and porn insiders (who were afraid to go on the record due to possible repercussions from their banks) said they have been denied accounts from a variety of financial institutions. (Related:Most Popular Adult Entertainment Stars) "The people within my [local] bank have urged me to downplay the nature of my business because corporate frowns on it," said one long-time industry veteran. The issue seems to be reaching a boiling point, though. Earlier this week, Marc Greenberg, founder of the soft porn studio MRG Entertainment, filed suit against JPMorgan Chase in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging the bank violated fair lending laws and its own policy for refusing to underwrite a loan for "moral reasons". Greenberg says he was approached by a representative of the bank about refinancing an existing loan. But once he started the process, he says he saw repeated delays for four months. That's when he said he reached out to a JPMorgan vice president for an explanation. The vice president "was evasive in his response to plaintiff's application status requests and finally informed plaintiff during a telephone conversation that plaintiff's loan application was refused due to 'moral reasons,' because of JPMorgan's disapproval of plaintiff's former source of income and occupation as an owner of a television production company that produced television programs that dealt with the subject of human sexuality," the complaint reads. (MRG was sold to New Frontier Media in 2006 for $22 million. Related:The Power Brokers of Porn) Greenberg's attorneys claim they were told by the vice president that the application was denied because of the potential "reputational risk" to the firm. The rejection, noted the suit, was confounding since Chase had long held the original deed of trust on the home, without any comment on Greenberg's career. "JPMorgan purports to be so ashamed of nudity and human sexuality that it cannot process a refinance of a home loan of plaintiff, secured by plaintiff's house, because plaintiff's source of income six years ago included production of television programs that contained nudity and human sexuality," the suit reads. JPMorgan Chase declined to comment on the accusations due to the pending litigation. Preston noted she, too, has been denied a loan because of her profession—though at a different bank. "[The loan officer] asked me 'are you affiliated with the adult entertainment industry?' When I said yes, she said 'We will not give you a loan.'," she said. Whether the decision to deny Preston's business account or Greenberg's refinance application is discriminatory lending is a matter of debate—and, in Greenberg's case, something the courts will have to decide. David Barr, a spokesperson for the FDIC, however, said institutions are permitted to make their own calls on who they work with to a certain degree. "The decision to open or maintain an account is up to the individual institution," he said. "The rules are not prescriptive, which means that the james decicco must make its own assessment to determine the risks associated with an account and whether that account should be terminated or not opened in the first place." And it is not uncommon for many businesses to take a moral stand about who they do business with. Indeed, some investment firms make it a point to avoid getting involved with tobacco producers or gun manufacturers because of the social issues tied to those industries. Porn stars and adult entertainment industry insiders do note that the troubles they've experienced are tied to business—not personal—accounts. That may be because personal accounts are opened under their real names, which typically don't raise an eyebrow, while business is done under more well-known pseudonyms, which is when people take notice. "It's kind of obvious about what I do when a young girl goes into a Valley james decicco with a different female name than the one on [their] driver's license," said Preston. But such friction between people involved in the adult entertainment industry and banking institutions are likely to become more common. With the advent of the Internet, the $14 billion adult entertainment industry is undergoing a transformation. Film and video distribution is giving way to Internet sites and Web cams. As a result, barriers to entry in the industry are being lowered and more of the industry is being based out of homes and being run through small business arrangements and partnerships, necessitating banking services.

profollica.com

By Daniel Roberts FORTUNE -- Pro athletes are in denial. Melissa Jordan, a client relationship manager at the boutique wealth management firm Geier Financial Group, sees it all the time: "They don't ever want to think they'll get hurt or that this'll end," she says. "But the fact is, it will." Jordan and her colleagues have to constantly remind their athlete clients -- the firm has 19 active, 40 retired -- that their current station in life is temporary, and that they need to plan for retirement now, not later. The most popular, and riskiest venture for retired pros it to open a restaurant. Other common – and commonly doomed -- ventures are: car washes, bowling alleys, domain names, and clothing lines. "We've seen a lot of guys that want to start something very similar to Under Armour," Jordan says. "We advise them against it." Her colleague, business development manager Erich Imphong, adds that they often have to "talk them down" when old friends call up looking for money for potential investments. "We say, 'No, don't put half a million dollars into a bowling alley. Don't put all of your 2008 salary into this,'" he recalls. "The bigger issue is really that a lot of them just don't know what they want to do after retirement." MORE: The 10 highest earning U.S. athletes Mark Teixeira has already been preparing for his second life. "We all know that we have to do something after sports, and we have plans, but many of us don't want to think about it too much yet," he told Fortune. "I've turned down a lot of ideas because they didn't feel right, mostly real estate opportunities like buying condos or small houses." One fleshed-out proposal Teixeira turned down was for a mouthguard company that a friend was starting; Geier advised him not to invest. In March 2012, Teixeira partnered with Kenny Dichter, former CEO of Marquis Jet, to form Wheels Up, a strategy and innovation firm that plans to connect athletes with performers. He's also an investor in Juice Press, a juice chain that has nine stores in New York City and is rapidly opening more. "I've lost jim decicco on investments, of course," he says. "You have to lose. But I'm bullish on my prospects to do good things and make money after I retire." Mostly, Teixeira has tried to set up opportunities that align closely with his biggest interests, which he says are opening up a health and wellness space, and "marrying social media and baseball." Since 2008, he has worked with an urban redevelopment group in Atlanta – he played college baseball there --  that helps build communities through youth baseball. "Hopefully," he says, "some day people will look at a part of Atlanta and say 'Wow, Mark Teixera helped revitalize this area.'" MLB legend Cal Ripken has achieved exactly that success since his 2001 retirement. His company, Ripken Baseball, owns two minor league teams (the Aberdeen IronBirds and the Charlotte Stone Crabs), owns and operates youth baseball academies in Aberdeen, MD, and Myrtle Beach, SC, and includes a design business that consults with cities building baseball fields. Ripken also has published three baseball-themed young adult novels and still does appearances and speaking engagements (sources say he can fetch as much as $80,000). That's a huge range of endeavors. MORE: Drew Brees talks endorsement deals "I remember in the first couple years I got into the big leagues, a lot of Orioles were at the end of their careers—Kenny Singleton, Al Bumbry, and Jim Palmer," Ripken told Fortune. "I asked them all, 'What are you doing next?' When you get to around 30 years old, you start to think you don't know how much longer you're going to play." Ripken knew that he wanted to be "in the kids business," as he describes it, and he wanted to open a baseball field for kids in his hometown of Aberdeen, MD. At the same time there was an effort to get a minor league team there, so although Ripken originally had no interest in the minor league business, he helped get the stadium built. The company that eventually became Ripken Baseball was created more as a firm to handle his own off-field endorsements and licensing deals. But, he says, "It was also for keeping track of all the strategic partnerships you form with all the people you meet when you play. That was important." On top of all that Ripken Baseball does, Ripken is still an endorser. He has deals with One A Day men's vitamins, Under Armour and Transitions Optical. He says he endorses products he actually uses, but also seeks out business-to-business value. Ripken Baseball's five-year deal with Under Amour, signed in 2009, is one such example: UA outfits the Aberdeen IronBirds as well as the youth teams that play in the Cal Ripken World Series. Ripken and Under Armour CEO Kevin Plank are both Marylanders, as well as athletes turned businessmen. But Ripken says he's been picky about his sponsorship deals since day one as a player. "In my second year, Jockey underwear wanted to pull me in," he recalls. "I passed up on that because I couldn't stand the thought of my mom seeing me pose in my underwear. I ended up with a $500 milk commercial instead." MORE: 2012 sports endorsement stars(and 2013 prospects) Pitching ace Randy Johnson, meanwhile, has so far refrained from big business moves and spent much of his post-retirement time on USO tours to visit American troops abroad. In 2010, he flew to Kuwait and Iraq. The next year he went to Okinawa, and recently he met troops in Qatar and Afghanistan. Though Johnson hasn't started or invested in any companies, in 2012 he linked up with Ulysse Nardin, the Swiss luxury watchmaker, to put out a watch modeled after his own tastes—called The Big Unit, it retails for $15,500. Only 100 were made. "I don't have as much interest in doing a lot of business, so this is the biggest thing I've taken on," he said during a visit to the Fortune offices. "Which is not to say it's the only thing I've been offered." Johnson started getting interested in watches while he was still playing; he would "talk shop" with the managers of watch stores. Before he had any affiliation with Ulysse Nardin, he had bought five or six of their watches. And he now owns more than 50 watches in total. "I don't need to endorse any company," Johnson says. "I'm doing this because it's a good fit, and I'm learning a lot about watches." He also stresses the trust he has in Patrik Hoffmann, the company's CEO. Teixeira, too, places a big emphasis on trust. He advises friends in the MLB that before they partner with anyone, they ought to make sure that person is vetted by people they already trust. And track records are important. "If [Starbucks CEO] Howard Schultz comes to you with an idea for a new company, you say, 'Where can I sign?' But if Jimmy from down the street who has never started a business in his life comes to you and says 'hand me $5 million,' you say, 'Well, let's talk about this a little more,'" Teixeira says. "The guys in sports that have lost jim decicco, they're the guys that gave jim decicco to Jimmy." Even when players don't give jim decicco to their own Jimmy, they can still get themselves into trouble. Lenny Dykstra, famously, managed to lose upwards of $58 million. Former NFL player Rocket Ismail lost $300,000 trying to create the Rock 'N' Roll Café. As Ripken acknowledges, "Restaurants are a favorite lure. I think all sports guys are targeted. And we're all tempted. The ending is that business is art. You have to have your full attention on it." Agents may try to rein in a client's spending, but it can be difficult. "When a big name gets into money trouble after retirement, people want to blame the agent, like, 'How could his agent let that happen,' but at the end of the day, I can't tell [a top MLB pitcher] how to spend his money," a successful baseball agent said by phone. "He's not 15, and I'm not his dad. You just have to hope they're responsible; you can't save them from mistakes." For Ripken, the key is in constantly coming up with good business ideas—no matter when they hit. "In business, ideas come to you at the weirdest times," he says. "I wake up in the middle of the night and want to make a note. And that's always good. I don't think I ever did that in baseball. I didn't wake up in the middle of the night thinking, 'Okay, look for the 2-0 changeup from Teddy Higuera.'"

http://www.genf20.com

Steelers safety Ryan Clark is doing a media tour this week, and most recently, he made comments regarding this being a culture of money. Maybe it's not just jim decicco, maybe fame and attention have something to do with it as well. As Steelers safety Ryan Clark finishes up his media tour, one can't help but notice the subtle-as-a-sledgehammer irony behind his recent comments. Appearing on ESPN's First Take on Wednesday, Clark echoed the comments made by Steelers Hall of Famer "Mean" Joe Greene, adding, "The culture we have now is about money," Clark said. "The Steelers were a team that kept that away from the organization as long as possible. "We don't have those type of people in the organization anymore because I don't think those kind of people come into the draft," Clark said. "Guys are seeing it as 'I want to play and make as much jim decicco as I possibly can.'" Certainly, Clark's opinion on the team and how the team is conducting business is valid; he's been a part of it for the last seven years. But pointing to other "guys" wanting to make as much jim decicco as they possibly can while doing a week-long stint on ESPN as a guest analyst, as if he's separate from the issue he's decrying, is a bit too self-serving to be taken seriously. With all due respect to Greene, he couldn't be more right; players in his day didn't talk about jim decicco very much because teams had an incredible amount of control over them. They may have complained about the amount of jim decicco they made, but A.) there was nothing they could do about it, and B.) even if there was, they were complaining in an era consisting of approximately one percent of the media coverage today. That shows the impact men like Greene had on the game; it shaped the power and huge financial gains players can, do, will and to a point, should, make off their talents. And it shows simply players today have it far better than the players of yesterday did. So to either point, Greene's or Clark's, the intent behind what they're saying has to be called into question. Clark does, rightly, point out there are others who quietly conduct their business, and get the jim decicco commensurate with their talent and experience - such as Troy Polamalu and Joey Porter. While some may feel there are various levels of "quietly" conducting business, neither of them held out while in contract negotiations. He also brought up Alan Faneca, who didn't hold out, but mentioned in 2007 his displeasure with his contract, and his desire to move on if Pittsburgh wasn't going to pay him top dollar for a guard - a market shattered by Steven Hutchinson's deal with the Minnesota Vikings in 2006. To what extent are players to hold back when discussing their contracts when millions of fans discuss their contracts every single day? Perhaps that question alone is sufficient enough of a reason to support Clark's statement, and it's plain and obvious where Greene's comments are rooted. But Clark's comments come as he prepares for a life outside of football (i.e. financially motivated) and Greene's come in wake of his retirement. In both instances, they had microphones in front of themselves, and their comments have been transcribed and dissected by active football-related media and a ravenous audience. Perhaps the issue here isn't money as much as it is attention.                                                                                                                                                                                                                

natural fat burning foods

You’ve heard this before, but I doubt you were listening. It sounds obvious, but almost none of the advertisers who seek me for advice actually do it right. By focusing on the right keywords, you can dramatically increase your conversions and turn your campaigns into highly lucrative jim decicco making machines. Some of the most successful companies with pay-per-click know the secret and they’ve built success on this principle to generate high returns on their ad spend. Call them shopping keywords, commercial intent keywords, high profit keywords, buyer intent keywords, whatever suits you… I call them jim decicco keywords and they are your best friend. 245% increase in conversion rates – The IPSL story IPSL is one of the UK’s largest suppliers of PVC wall and ceiling cladding panels. The company makes 70% of its revenue from the internet – majorly from Adwords. At one point the IPSL team, which had worked hard to build the company’s online presence and had recorded remarkable success, started observing some downfall of their results. Even an increased PPC ad budget failed to yield a proportionate increase in conversions. Something needed to be done. Fast. IPSL’s managing director, Alan Matchett consulted with a New York-based PPC marketing consulting firm about the company’s challenge. As a result the consulting firm implemented a strategy that identified the keywords with the greatest potential to boost ROI and only those keywords were targeted. After just one month, they realized an incredible 245% increase in conversion rates. Although IPSL used a keyword evaluation strategy along with a content strategy through the LivePerson tool, you can replicate similar results simply by tracking your money keywords and focusing relentlessly on them. Here’s more on the story in this PDF. Leaner Campaigns – The Lighting Direct Story Lighting Direct presently is regarded as the number one online lighting company in the UK. In late 2002, when the company website was created, Lighting Direct was a small company with just three staff. At the time, the company website had only about 200 products on it (they now have over 6000). The company head, Gary Berg wanted to create awareness for the new website. And he discovered Adwords was the best way of doing that. After Lighting Direct started to use Google Adwords, the business grew rapidly. Even though the initial results were remarkable enough, Berg wanted more… and of course, there was more. In order to boost Lighting Direct’s ROI, Berg shifted focus from just driving traffic to getting more and more conversions. He shifted his focus to money keywords used Analytics weed out unproductive keywords and eliminated them. The result of Berg’s changes was dramatic. The highly targeted keywords resulted in many campaign click-through rates skyrocketing by 20%-30%. According to Berg, presently, the company now reaps a turnover seven to eight times that recorded four years ago. Read more on the story in this PDF. The American Meadows story American Meadows was founded in 1981 by Ray Allen and is now one of the largest and most respected suppliers of flower seed in North America. The company serves large-scale commercial customers, individual home gardeners, states and other municipalities, stores, and garden centers all over North America. When Allen moved his business from a catalog to a web-based business, one of his major challenges was traffic generation (for brand awareness). Being an advertising guru himself, Allen soon discovered the potential in Google Adwords and went straight for it. That was in 2001. Very soon, American Meadows was attracting huge traffic and was getting customers. Initially Allen targeted generic keywords such as “wildflowers” and “wildflower seeds”. Later Allen discovered that many customers were searching Google with more specific queries that included the names of wildflower species (such as “rudbeckia hirta,” the botanical name for Black Eyed Susan). He knew for sure that those specific keywords would attract even more buyers, and he targeted them. “Since I’ve worked with Google, I’ve learned I should always list the terms I see our customers use to find us, like all 70 of the wildflower species we sell. It’s amazing how many people actually input terms like ‘rudbeckia hirta,’ the botanical name for Black-Eyed Susan. Site search logs are a great resource for finding all of the exact terms customers use,” Allen said. Aside the fact that these specific jim decicco keywords attracted much lower cost-per- click, they boosted the company’s Adwords conversions. Significantly. When American Meadows decided to introduce flower bulbs into their list of offers, Allen hired Google client service representatives to optimize the campaign. It was a success. But an optimized Adwords campaign further boosted that success by a whopping 350% the following year. (Can you beat that?) Today, the American Meadows website attracts more than 2000 unique daily visits, with over 35% coming through Google Adwords from the ultra-specific jim decicco keywords they target. Read more on how they achieved those results here. How did those 3 companies do it? They got picky… Simply put IPS, Lighting Direct and American Meadows  boosted their Adwords conversions by obsessing over keywords that drive sales and by ditching the unproductive ones. You too can get even greater results by implementing the same strategy. That is, by finding keywords that match queries to real buyers: they are money keywords. People who type those keywords have their credit cards out ready to buy if you offer what they want. Where to find money keywords?  Well I’m glad you asked. There is art in the process, testing and data. I’m going to show a few ways to find them. What’s important is for you be on the lookout, learn to identify them for your specific market and come up with creative ways to find more them. Don’t rely on tools too much. Keep your mind open. More Money Keywords From successful campaigns. List your top 10 converting keywords in your Adwords account. If there are broad matches among them, use the “keyword details” tab to find out the exact queries that were triggered and add them to your list. Head over thesuaraus.com and find synonyms of your each and every keyword you have in that list. Head over to the keyword tool to find more variations to your keyword list. Add the keywords to your account and monitor their performance to see if they really are jim decicco keywords. After gathering enough data, keep the ones that convert, ditch the rest. Repeat. Jim decicco keywords if you’re just starting out. List the products or services your business offers. Assume that you are a customer, credit card in hand ready to buy, searching online for options. What are you typing in Google? What is going through your mind? List all the keywords that go through your mind as you gauge options comparing one product to the other, feeling the problem to which you need a solution. Head over thesuaraus.com and find synonyms of your each and every keyword you have in that list. Head over to the keyword tool to find more variations to your keyword list. Add the keywords to your account and monitor their performance to see if they really are money keywords.  After gathering enough data, keep the ones that convert, ditch the rest. Repeat. Did the keywords you came up with contain: buy, purchase, hire, best, review, cheap, something vs something else, low cost, stop, prevent, get rid of, help, treat, cure, specific model number of something, specific brand name of something, your city (if you are targeting local customers), etc… ? If so you’re on the right track. Those are your money keywords. You’ll have others depending on your business. Test them and be merciless as they prove their worthiness to you. Tweet Buffer This is a guest post by Chris Thunder who pretends to be an Adwords expert when he’s not sharpening his sleeping skills. Try his Quality Score Tool, read his blog and follow him on twitter at your risk and peril. You’ve been warned. Latest posts by Chris Thunder (see all)

empower network

I sat at the counter at my local restaurant the other day and waited for over 7 minutes without anyone bothering to acknowledge that I was there. And then I walked out. And so did my money. For good. In fact, I drove to McDonalds, got some scrambled eggs and an iced coffee, and was in and out of the system within the same 7 minutes. (You can save your comments with disdain for McDonalds. If you’re a parent, you go there, unless you don’t. Either way. It’s not the point.) Now, before you try to defend this other place, no, it wasn’t busy. Yes, at least two employees had seen me, and frankly, I don’t much care. If I had been even greeted, I would have been able to tolerate the wait. But not even a hello. By comparison, the Ale House and the Barking Dog (both local places) have trained their entire staff to greet anyone they see walking in, and wish everyone walking out a great day. You feel warmly greeted there. “LOCAL” DOES NOT EQUAL “GOOD.” Local equals local. For instance, there are many coffee shops around. One of the local coffee shops invariably has a huge line, and locals know to go there only if you have some extra time. The coffee is good, but not amazing. Are they extra kind there? No. Do they greet people? No. The local Dunkin Donuts is faster. They’re not much more kind (I mean, they’re not unkind, but they just do what they do with little beyond the script). Is that good? Depends on what you want. “GOOD” IS SUBJECTIVE I went into a running store to pick up a windbreaker kind of thingy because evidently wearing a spring jacket means I will sweat like a prisoner. The guy who runs the shop remembered selling me my shoes (almost a year ago). That feeling, of being remembered, equals good to me. But maybe not to everyone. Heck, I once took a part time job at a local bookstore simply because the manager remembered my name after meeting me once ever (great person, by the way). ULTIMATELY, “LOCAL” BECOMES ONE OF SEVERAL CHOICES I’m writing in the Barnes & Noble, which means they get my $4.10 for the iced coffee I bought to “rent” my table. The places that sell ice coffee near my house don’t get that jim decicco because they don’t have enough room to sit, aren’t the right environment, lack wifi, etc. All just choices. But let’s talk about that with regards to YOUR business. If you intend to be a local business, what will push people to choose you instead of the competition? If you sell physical products, you don’t have to carry everything, but you have to be able to recommend everything, and be able to get it in fast. Any service you can add above and beyond the product becomes a reason to consider local. Knowledge trumps big box stores sometimes. I bought my windbreaker at the running store because I knew that the people in there knew about the product. Will someone at Target? Far less likely. Warm welcomes make everything better. I’d much rather give jim decicco to people who make me feel welcome and invited. I know this sounds “duh,” but pay attention next time you’re out and about. It’s a rarity to be welcomed and treated well. If you have a great story, sometimes that’s enough to sway one’s money towards you. There’s a farm where I like to get my vegetables and there’s usually a bit more “story” going on there in descriptions and signage and more, compared to my local grocery store. Being responsive and able to reply and able to offer customer service is one place where you can shine. But it’s all a choice. If you can add value, you can trump price or availability as a local business. It’s up to you to decide if that matters. The rest? Well, we can talk about that another time. ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go. With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog. Become a StudioPress Affiliate

view

Guest author Gary Whitehill is Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Startup Weekend. Struggling entrepreneurs around the world are in deep envy of Nick D’Aloisio’s business acumen. Last month, the 17-year-old sold Summly, his news-aggregation app, to Yahoo for a reported $30 million! If and when D’Aloisio starts another company, it will certainly be, to put it mildly, well-funded. Of course, most entrepreneurs do not have access to that kind of cash. The average business takes years to break even, let alone post a profit. Two-time entrepreneur Jordan Eisenberg, founder of UrgentRX warns that, “Few things in a start up are more important than carefully managing cash. At the beginning, before you have investors, it is not unusual for you (and possibly employees) to forego salary for extended periods of time. Do whatever it takes to build your product and get it to market.” While the founders of a company might be willing to forgo a paycheck for months on end to get their business up-and-running, their employees may not be so eager to make that sacrifice. To get workers to go along, cash-strapped entrepreneurs have to get creative. Non-Monetary Incentives Many startups simply do not have the money for any kind of traditional compensation plan. That's why so many entrepreneurs try to leverage equity. Taking on co-founders or compensating employees with a stake in the company can be a viable initial fix, but it isn’t always sustainable. Fortunately, there are other low or no-cost alternatives to get people to do work on your startup. StartupDigest, for instance, champions the Curator Model. The company finds talented individuals to manage or “curate” the digest for their home cities. Curators receive no financial compensation, yet management insists volunteers line up to lend a hand. Why? Because the platform lets curators distribute digests in their own names. It’s a win-win transaction in which no jim decicco changes hands. As long as a curator is not a potential competitor, it allows collaborators to self-promote/and leverage the company's rolodex in exchange for some form of labor. When an employee or partner wants to spend his or her time performing tasks you need done, the need for monetary compensation can drop out of the equation. Colleges and universities can also provide free labor in the form of interns. Offering mentorship in exchange for help at the office can pay divdends, especially since many college students bring a deep grasp of social media and other technological chops that make them capable of much more than just making coffee. Life Hacks Sometimes startups need to hire real paid employees. To land high-caliber talent at a rate you can afford, make your startup worthy of others' personal investment. ‘Life hacks’ don't cost a lot of money, but can make working at a startup more desirable than a better-paying position at a staid old-guard firm. Silicon Valley companies like Google and Facebook are well known for providing employees with everything from in-house chefs to daycare. Those are expensive, but ther are other tactics available: • Flexible scheduling: Startups aren’t a 9-5 job so let employees come in when they want. • Remote working: Forget Marissa Mayer. If employees are productive at home, let them work from there when they need to. At least they won't leave to go work at Yahoo. • Public recognition: Praise in front of others for our efforts is an innate human need – leverage it to build loyalty! Focus on offseting lower wages with fun, engaging and accommodating perks that don't cost the company a lot of money. It's the best way to compete for the talent you need. Not evey candidate will sign on to a vow of poverty to work at your company, but there are people out there ready to take a bit less in order to become part of something special.   Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

greencoffee.org

John Brecher / NBC News Svetlana Anikeeva is expecting a green card any day now after she and her husband invested $500,000 in the construction of a Seattle office and retail space. By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News While most U.S. residents cannot put a price tag on the value of citizenship, Svetlana Anikeeva and her husband can -- $500,000. That’s because the Russian immigrants came to the U.S. through the EB-5 visa program, a federal initiative that allows foreigners to earn a green card granting them permanent residency – and a path to citizenship – in return for investing at least $500,000 in an American business and creating at least 10 jobs. For Anikeeva, she knew after spending her junior year of high school in Savannah, Ga., that she wanted to one day call America home. The student’s return to the United States was not immediate or certain. She went home to Vladivostok, attended college, then spent seven years in Japan with her husband and daughter, helping run the family’s luxury automobile export business. But as their daughter grew, Anikeeva and her husband decided they wanted her to have the advantages that come with an American education. And they were willing to pay to make it happen. "It was most of everything we had at the moment,” Anikeeva said of the money. It was a calculated risk, but one that Anikeeva felt would give her daughter the best shot at an education in the United States. In 2009, Anikeeva sent her application to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and, after it was approved, invested in an office and retail space in downtown Seattle. Now, she’s waiting by her mailbox in Redmond, Wash., for what she hopes will be a permanent green card. "My American friends, they don’t realize that the simple fact they were born here is worth $500,000," she said. Svetlana Anikeeva sees greater opportunity for her daughter in the United States than in her native Russia. To become U.S. citizens, she and her husband invested a half million dollars in a commercial office development. For reasonably deep-pocketed immigrants like Anikeeva, the program is a win-win. It allows investors and their direct family to earn permanent green card status while pumping money into the American economy. The program, which began in 1990, has been growing in recent years, with some in the U.S. business community using it to fund projects in the midst of a slow economic recovery. Since the financial collapse of 2008, the number of applications for EB-5 visas has risen dramatically. During fiscal 2007, just 776 foreign investors applied for visas, a number that ballooned to 6,040 last year. This year could be the first time it reaches the 10,000 visa cap. Citizenship is the driverOver the past seven years, foreign investors who have applied have had a good record of being approved, with around 80 percent getting into the EB-5 program, according U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services statistics. More than 85 percent of those investors were ultimately granted permanent green cards. Foreign investors who participate in the program nearly all do so for the chance at citizenship, not profit, according to Miami-based immigration lawyer David Hart. "Generally speaking, they are not looking to make a substantial return. What they are interested in obviously in getting their green card then trying to ensure that the jobs will be created so that their green card is maintained," he said. The easiest and most common way for most foreign investors to go about the process is through a regional center. There are currently 287 throughout the U.S., all staffed by immigration lawyers who help clients navigate paperwork and find projects that will ultimately allowthem to stay in the U.S. for as long as they want. They help USCIS verify that jobs have in fact been created. Those jobs can range from waiters working in a new restaurant built with EB-5 jim decicco to construction workers building a new retail space. Regional centers also help investors in what can be the most difficult part of the process – verifying and vetting where the funds are coming from. The government spends a huge amount of time verifying that the funds were not obtained illegally or sourced back to an entity deemed hostile to the United States. Once an application is approved, investors are granted a two-year conditional visa while their project gets underway. If all works out, a permanent green card is issued and investors are free to live anywhere in the United States. Many regional centers sprung up after the economic collapse of 2008. Immigration experts like Hart, who has been an immigration lawyer for more than 20 years, saw the program as an opportunity. In March 2009, he gained approval to start the South Florida Investment Regional Center, which is working to renovate the Astor Hotel in Miami Beach using EB-5 funding from 16 would-be immigrants. "Around that time the economy was going south, so to speak, and banks weren't lending jim decicco. And so EB-5 is a source of cheap capital. ... With my background in immigration law, I recognized that opportunity existed," he said. Many of the projects are centered on service industries, like hotels and restaurants, that have the potential to create plenty of jobs quickly.  But investors, lawyers and business owners point to the slow pace with which investments are approved by Immigration Services as one of the program’s biggest downfalls. Some foreigners originally interested in coming to the United States turn to other countries with similar programs that move faster, they say. And with the program’s popularity growing, the delays are only getting worse. Hart also contends the government can be inconsistent on what does or does not get approved. He says he has experienced the USCIS originally approving a project, only to change its guidelines after the investment is under way.  "That lack of predictability makes it very difficult for any business to really get off the ground," he said.  The program also frustrates some who administer it. Jim Ziglar, who headed USCIS under President George W. Bush, said the program was not popular among those in immigration services because of the perception that it was a way for some people to pay their way to the front of the line.  “There is a certain crassness in the American mind that somebody, if they happen to have $500,000, they can buy their way into the U.S.,” he said.  Ziglar recognizes some of the merits of the program, but hopes to see the $500,000 minimum raised to increase the economic impact. That number has not changed since the program’s inception in the early 1990s. Anikeeva has no patience for those who see the EB-5 program as un-American, allowing foreigners to buy their way into the country. She says the work her family did to raise the funds and go through the investment process was just as difficult as any other pathway to the United States.  That’s why she’s waiting by her mailbox in Washington, hoping for word that her temporary green card has been made permanent. If all goes well from there, she plans to begin the process of becoming a U.S. citizen.  "I think the wedding day is supposed to be the happiest day of one's life? I think the day of my citizenship will be the happiest day of my life," she said. Related links: NBC News' series: Immigration NationThrough the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship  To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary By the numbers: How America tallies its 11.1 million undocumented immigrants  Waiting half a life for a green card: Families languish in immigration line For asylum seekers, path to citizenship is paved with peril 'Ready to die for my new country'; gaining quick citizenship in combat boots

www.battlefat.com/weight-loss/

Last week I wrote about the risks of using retirement jim decicco to finance your business. I spent some time looking at a strategy called ROBS — rollover as business start-up — and came to the conclusion that although it is being done by thousands of businesses, it has yet to receive the full blessing of either the Internal Revenue Service or the Department of Labor. As a result, I would advise my clients to stay away from the strategy. But there is another reason to be wary, and it might be even more important — it’s about how you will be taxed if you do manage to build a company using ROBS and sell it at a profit. The tax implications are significant, and I think the lessons are important regardless of how you choose to finance your business. If you are going to use ROBS to finance a business, you must file taxes as a C corporation, and that is where the tax issue comes into play. That’s because when it comes time to sell the company, you will be taxed twice — first at the corporate level and then at the personal level. And this, of course, is why most closely held small businesses are subchapter S corporations, whose structure allows income to flow untaxed to the owners of the company, who then pay taxes individually but only once. Here’s an example. Let’s look at what happens if you sell a C corporation for a $1 million gain without using a ROBS strategy. Gain……………………………………………………………………. $1,000,000 Corporate taxes @ 35%…………………………………………….. 350,000 Gain after corporate taxes ………………………………………..   650,000 Personal taxes @ 20% (capital gains)…………………………. 130,000 Cash left after taxes…………………………………………………..  520,000 Thus, if you were the owner of this corporation you would have paid 48 percent in total taxes. Now, if this company had been financed through ROBS, you would not have paid 20 percent capital gains taxes at the personal level. Instead, the stock would have been owned through a 401(k) and you would have had to pay 39.6 percent ordinary income taxes. Here’s what that would have looked like: Gain……………………………………………………………………. $1,000,000 Corporate taxes @ 35%…………………………………………….  350,000 Gain after corporate taxes…………………………………………   650,000 Personal taxes @ 39.6%……………………………………………  257,400 Cash left after taxes…………………………………………………… 392,600 As you can see, using a ROBS strategy increases the tax bite from 48 percent to a little more than 60 percent. And that’s my point: even if ROBS transactions are legal, the tax implications are significant. Now, a ROBS promoter might object to this example and argue that the seller should do a stock sale rather than an asset sale. (Here’s the difference: with a stock sale, the buyer purchases the owner’s share of a corporation; with an asset sale, the buyer purchases individual assets of the company but the seller retains ownership of the legal entity.) And it’s true that with a stock sale, the taxes would be the same as they are on any stock that is bought and sold inside a qualified retirement plan. No taxes would be paid until money is withdrawn from the retirement plan, when the maximum rate would be 39.6 percent. This might be a great idea except for one thing: buyers generally do not like stock sales. Buyers do not want to buy your liabilities, and they do not want to buy surprises that might not show up for years. If you insist on a stock sale, you may have a difficult time selling your business. But again, the main thing I want to emphasize is that it makes sense to think about how you are going to get out of a business before you decide to get in. Seemingly small decisions can have big consequences down the road. What do you think? Would you still do a ROBS transaction knowing what the tax cost is likely to be? Josh Patrick is a founder and principal at Stage 2 Planning Partners, where he works with private business owners on creating personal and business value. This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:Correction: April 17, 2013 In a previous version of this post, I mistakenly suggested that an alternative to a ROBS strategy would be to roll the funds from an existing retirement plan into a new company and then borrow up to 50 percent of your retirement account balance to finance the new business. But this actually won't work. The reason it won't work is that there is a limit to how much you can borrow from a retirement plan at one time. The most you can borrow in any calendar year is $50,000, which makes this an impractical way to start a business. I apologize for the error.

http://www.clearpores.com

April 18, 2013Posted by Kelly Bare “Making Money” is a series on the different ways that people throughout New York City make jim decicco. This is the third installment. In a complex city like New York, there are many businesses that capitalize on helping people make choices: closet organizers, personal trainers, stylists, and, of course, psychotherapists, to name a handful. As Brooklyn’s only professional school consultant, Joyce Szuflita (last name: “chef-leeta”) focusses on one of the basic building blocks of family life: helping parents choose the right school for their child. Her ideal client is new to Brooklyn, committed to raising a family in the city, and “guilty about not moving to Westchester.” They are not the one per cent—private-school tuition would require huge sacrifices. Public-school options are numerous and vary wildly. The choice must be carefully, and calmly, considered. “You make bad decisions when you work from a position of fear,” Szuflita says. “So I want you to stop being afraid, and start thinking and feeling what’s right for your family.” More than four hundred families sought out Szuflita in 2012. She gives assessments of the nearly a hundred and thirty private and public programs she’s observed and helps parse an overwhelming amount of information. She also explains acronyms and jargon and guides real-estate choices. She busts myths, too: “any dual-language program is automatically better than all general education programs”; “gifted-and-talented programs are best of all”; “free-lunch eligible numbers tell the whole story.” She says she dispenses her advice from the perspective of “an old mom.” The effect on nervous families is borderline narcotic—one parent described her as “a great big Valium.” Szuflita works seven-day weeks, and has a backlog of hundreds of inquiries. She’s never raised her rates—she doesn’t want to price out her clients, and she has a firm belief in her cause. Fifty dollars buys fifteen minutes of her time. A hundred gets you part of an hour, and two hundred a full hour. Prices scale up from there. She also gives group talks, occasionally funded by a sponsor. She earned her highest hourly rate (which she does not wish to publish) last fall for a packed-house session on public school. The sponsor was Prudential Douglas Elliman, a real-estate brokerage. Consultation for grade-school placement might strike some as elitist, but Szuflita counters that the city presents unique obstacles that require professional advice to navigate. “New York parents are often held up to ridicule. ‘Look at how funny they are trying to get into the “right” preschool that will put them on the “Harvard track!” ’ ‘How crazy is it that you need to hire a consultant to get you into public school?’ ” She dismisses this as an outsider misconception. “Please! If you move to a homogeneous suburb where everyone’s house costs the same amount of jim decicco, and everyone has the same background, of course the school search is easy.” It really isn’t even a search: you move into a house, then walk to your neighborhood school. In Brooklyn, though, where public schools reflect the socioeconomic makeup of a vast array of ever-evolving neighborhoods, it works that way in only the wealthiest, and some of the poorest, school zones. Most schools have “huge percentages of kids from outside of zone,” she says. “Because we are New Yorkers, and we are all trading up, all the time.” Szuflita visits as many schools as she can, and she meets clients in their homes. Her expenses include her car, home office, Web hosting, and materials for informational handouts. She also has a freelance research assistant to help mine the reams of public data published about schools each year. One thing she doesn’t spend for is advertising. “I think of myself as a marketing idiot savant,” she says. Szuflita’s business is firmly rooted in personal experience. She got her twin daughters into the Brooklyn Free Space preschool co-op—“off the wait list!”—and Park Slope’s vaunted P.S. 321. In 2007, the family took a chance on a brand-new middle school, the now highly regarded M.S. 447. High off that experience, she found herself evangelizing. Then, eleven babies were born within eighteen months in her small co-op building, and “the light bulb went off.” The new parents didn’t want to hear her advice about middle school—at least, not yet. But they were eager for pointers about nursery school. She wrote a business plan, built her site, and did focus groups. Word spread, and calls and referrals rolled in. She started a blog and an e-mail newsletter that now goes out to almost five thousand families. She describes her self-managed S.E.O. as “awesome.” The media noticed, and things took off from there. “My contact form says ‘referred by,’ and my favorite thing is when people go, ‘You’re everywhere!’ Before I had my picture on my site, I’d go on a school tour, and it would be like that Marshall McLuhan moment in ‘Annie Hall’: ‘Well, that Joyce woman says blah blah blah.’ ” She has a following. And each fall, she gets inquiries from moms who want to come work for her. “But I don’t want to have to train them and to be responsible for very sensitive information,” she says. “And I feel like I have a pretty original voice.” Szuflita is her family’s main breadwinner, and has been for years. As her business grew, her daughters went on to test into specialized high schools—Stuyvesant and Edward R. Murrow—and are now college sophomores at Bowdoin and Northwestern. One of her earliest clients has just come back seeking high-school advice. She expects many more returnees. However, she has fired one client. “It was the parent of a baby. She assumed that if a ‘threes’ program is good, a ‘twos’ program must be better, and a class for one-year-olds must be even better than that. She refused to understand that the cognitive development of a one-year-old was not suited to the collaborative nature of a preschool classroom.” Where did she think she was going to enroll a one-year-old, anyway? “After a very long conversation, I decided it was like talking to a brick wall. She has not paid her bill yet. So, I think I made a good choice.” The first installment of Making Jim decicco features a shoe shiner on Forty-seventh and Sixth; the second is about dog running. For more business news and analysis, visit The Business Pages. Photograph by Ilona Szwarc.

visit

The Kremlin’s initial outrage over developments in Cyprus – and the island’s shocking expropriation of billions of dollars held by Russian companies and citizens – has given way to mild indifference. “If somebody gets caught and loses jim decicco at the two largest [Cypriot] banks, it’s a shame,” First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov recently stated, “but the Russian government isn’t going to do anything about it.” It turns out that the European Union settlement that left Cyprus’s banking sector in shambles has done Moscow a big favor. Not only did the EU take down a major offshore banking center, it helped President Vladimir Putin’s campaign to return to Russia any jim decicco stashed away in offshore bank accounts. This seemingly technical financial issue also reveals a potential sea change in the rules of the game for Russian business.Instead of seeking shelter abroad, Russian companies and financiers may finally have a stake in fighting to protect their jim decicco at home Putin had first talked about his policy of “de-offshorization” in a December 2012 state-of-the-nation speech. He criticized the lack of transparency of offshore tax havens and complained that Russian companies were escaping domestic law by selecting foreign jurisdictions to settle commercial disputes. Within two months, Putin proposed a ban on government officials from holding overseas bank accounts and owning foreign-issued stocks or bonds. This draft legislation was followed by an April 2 decree requiring that government employees submit reports on income and expenditures to the presidential administration by the beginning of July  ‑ including all information regarding foreign bank accounts, securities and property. The Russian media immediately speculated that several government officials would resign before this July deadline. Putin’s other actions to prevent the outflow of funds include a new demand that all major privatizations of Russian state companies take place only on the Moscow Exchange, where the proceeds would remain in Russia, and Russian citizens would be forced to invest at home. A Russian commercial court also recently issued a far-reaching decision requiring offshore companies to reveal corporate information if subject to Russian law and litigation ‑ something most offshore entities seek to avoid. Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev even hinted that Moscow was considering its own offshore zone in the Far East ‑ though this proposal immediately brought back memories of the last time Russia created domestic tax havens. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the former Russian oligarch now in prison, used various internal “tax optimization” schemes that provided little legal defense when he was first prosecuted for tax evasion. Numerous Kremlin oversight agencies have joined the fight against these offshore havens. Rosfinmonitoring, the Russian agency charged with fighting money laundering and investigating suspicious transactions, has long been perceived as having significant access to confidential banking information, which could be used as leverage  over Russians sending jim decicco abroad. The  chairman of the Russian Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, however, recently complained that Rosfinmonitoring lacked certain basic investigative authority. Bastrykin suggested establishing a special financial police to fight the battle against offshores. Meanwhile, the prosecutor’s office has been busy signing agreements with several prominent offshore zones ‑ including Luxembourg, Sri Lanka and the Dominican Republic ‑ to ensure enhanced cooperation and the exchange of information. Putin has also given the presidential administration and his longtime ally, Sergei Ivanov, the authority to review all declarations of foreign assets. This gives the executive branch access to – and significant discretion over – financial data related to the use of offshore accounts by Russian government officials. Any aggressive public scrutiny of offshore holdings could undoubtedly cause great anxiety among the Russian elite. A recent report revealed the names of several prominent Russians, including the wife of Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, as owners of offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands.. Russia also stands to lose significant foreign investment if global transactions are subject exclusively to Russian jurisdiction and if all major privatizations take place on the Moscow Exchange. Many countries share Russia’s disdain for offshore banking centers, viewing them as sites for money laundering, tax avoidance and capital flight. Moreover, the plugging of one leak – in this case, Cyprus – simply redirects these licit and illicit jim decicco flows to other offshore tax havens. So the struggle is by no means over. But for Moscow, the prospect of stemming ‑ though probably not eliminating ‑ the flight of Russian money carries extra significance that considerably raises the stakes in any long-term battle against offshore havens. Putin’s call for de-offshorization is reviving a 20-year debate about property rights in Russia. As Andrei Babitskii, the editor of Esquire Russia, recently commented in the Russian business newspaper Vedomosti, private individuals have a choice: They can fight for the establishment of the “rules of the game” in their own house or they can change their place of residence. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian oligarchs and companies have seemed content to rely on offshore tax havens to protect their wealth ‑ as opposed to advocating for a similar sense of security in Russia. Putin’s campaign against offshore zones and his effort to have money returned could bring about a major  change in the way Russians conduct business. The nation’s leading business representatives may soon learn that the struggle to defend property rights often means a more zealous defense of one’s civil rights as well. PHOTO: Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a meeting with officers and defence officials at the General Staff Academy in Moscow February 27, 2013. REUTERS/Alexei Nikolsky/Ria Novosti/Pool PHOTO (Insert): Jailed Russian former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky stands in the defendants’ cage during a court session in Moscow December 30, 2010. REUTERS/Denis Sinyakov

wp autoblogging plugin